Post-Darwinian Kantians and Post-Kantian Darwinians: Epistemology, Metaphysics, and Science

In this article, I argue that Kant's work influenced the epistemology and science of the 19th and 20th centuries. This influence can be understood in both positive and negative ways. To address this, I consider two paradigmatic cases. The first is Thomas Kuhn, who defined himself as a «post-Dar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Ramírez Jiménez, Adrián Josué
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:Costa Rica
Institución:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UCR
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/65011
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/65011
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Kant
Kuhn
Haeckel
Epistemología
Metafísica
Ciencia
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Science
id CR_17d79c3f36a80aa9d6f0cb370127ad2e
oai_identifier_str oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/65011
network_acronym_str CR
network_name_str Costa Rica
repository_id_str
spelling Post-Darwinian Kantians and Post-Kantian Darwinians: Epistemology, Metaphysics, and ScienceKantianos post-darwinianos y darwinianos post-kantianos: epistemología, metafísica y ciencia Ramírez Jiménez, Adrián JosuéKantKuhnHaeckelEpistemologíaMetafísicaCienciaKantKuhnHaeckelEpistemologyMetaphysicsScienceIn this article, I argue that Kant's work influenced the epistemology and science of the 19th and 20th centuries. This influence can be understood in both positive and negative ways. To address this, I consider two paradigmatic cases. The first is Thomas Kuhn, who defined himself as a «post-Darwinian Kantian» in his text, The Road since Structure. Kuhn is interesting in addressing the question of the meaning of this statement. The second case is Ernst Haeckel, who begins by criticizing Kant's dualist philosophy. The influence here is negative if we consider his monistic approach. En este artículo planteo que existe una influencia de la obra de Kant en la epistemología y en la ciencia de los siglos XIX y XX. Esta influencia puede entenderse de manera tanto positiva como negativa. Para abordar esto, tomo dos casos paradigmáticos. El primero es el caso de Thomas Kuhn, quien se autodefinió como un «kantiano post-darwiniano» en su texto The Road since Structure. De Kuhn interesa plantearse la pregunta sobre el sentido de esta afirmación. El segundo caso es Ernst Haeckel, quien parte de la crítica a la filosofía dualista de Kant. La influencia aquí es negativa si se considera su propuesta monista.  Universidad de Costa Rica2025-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionartículo originalhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/6501110.15517/revfil.2025.65011Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica; Vol. 64 No. 169 (2025): Revista de filosofíaRevista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica; Vol. 64 Núm. 169 (2025): Revista de filosofía2215-55890034-825210.15517/revfil.2025reponame:Portal de Revistas UCRinstname:Universidad de Costa Ricainstacron:UCRspahttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/65011/64286https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/65011/64287Derechos de autor 2025 Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Ricahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cr/acceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-05-27T20:03:48Zoai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/65011Portal de revistashttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/Universidadhttp://www.ucr.ac.crhttps://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/index/oaijorge.polanco@ucr.ac.crCosta RicaNo aplicaNo aplicaNo aplicaopendoar:2025-08-13T10:50:00.322Portal de Revistas UCR - Universidad de Costa Ricafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Post-Darwinian Kantians and Post-Kantian Darwinians: Epistemology, Metaphysics, and Science
Kantianos post-darwinianos y darwinianos post-kantianos: epistemología, metafísica y ciencia
title Post-Darwinian Kantians and Post-Kantian Darwinians: Epistemology, Metaphysics, and Science
spellingShingle Post-Darwinian Kantians and Post-Kantian Darwinians: Epistemology, Metaphysics, and Science
Ramírez Jiménez, Adrián Josué
Kant
Kuhn
Haeckel
Epistemología
Metafísica
Ciencia
Kant
Kuhn
Haeckel
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Science
title_short Post-Darwinian Kantians and Post-Kantian Darwinians: Epistemology, Metaphysics, and Science
title_full Post-Darwinian Kantians and Post-Kantian Darwinians: Epistemology, Metaphysics, and Science
title_fullStr Post-Darwinian Kantians and Post-Kantian Darwinians: Epistemology, Metaphysics, and Science
title_full_unstemmed Post-Darwinian Kantians and Post-Kantian Darwinians: Epistemology, Metaphysics, and Science
title_sort Post-Darwinian Kantians and Post-Kantian Darwinians: Epistemology, Metaphysics, and Science
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ramírez Jiménez, Adrián Josué
author Ramírez Jiménez, Adrián Josué
author_facet Ramírez Jiménez, Adrián Josué
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Kant
Kuhn
Haeckel
Epistemología
Metafísica
Ciencia
Kant
Kuhn
Haeckel
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Science
topic Kant
Kuhn
Haeckel
Epistemología
Metafísica
Ciencia
Kant
Kuhn
Haeckel
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Science
description In this article, I argue that Kant's work influenced the epistemology and science of the 19th and 20th centuries. This influence can be understood in both positive and negative ways. To address this, I consider two paradigmatic cases. The first is Thomas Kuhn, who defined himself as a «post-Darwinian Kantian» in his text, The Road since Structure. Kuhn is interesting in addressing the question of the meaning of this statement. The second case is Ernst Haeckel, who begins by criticizing Kant's dualist philosophy. The influence here is negative if we consider his monistic approach. 
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-05-31
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
artículo original
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/65011
10.15517/revfil.2025.65011
url https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/65011
identifier_str_mv 10.15517/revfil.2025.65011
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/65011/64286
https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/65011/64287
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2025 Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cr/
acceso abierto
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2025 Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cr/
acceso abierto
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Costa Rica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Costa Rica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica; Vol. 64 No. 169 (2025): Revista de filosofía
Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica; Vol. 64 Núm. 169 (2025): Revista de filosofía
2215-5589
0034-8252
10.15517/revfil.2025
reponame:Portal de Revistas UCR
instname:Universidad de Costa Rica
instacron:UCR
instname_str Universidad de Costa Rica
instacron_str UCR
institution UCR
reponame_str Portal de Revistas UCR
collection Portal de Revistas UCR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Portal de Revistas UCR - Universidad de Costa Rica
repository.mail.fl_str_mv jorge.polanco@ucr.ac.cr
_version_ 1849325457675124736
score 15,812455

Similares en LA Referencia