El destino de la democracia: ¿Universalismo deliberativo o complementariedad participativa?
Today Habermas and Apel represent two opposite position in the debate of the fate of democracy in the European Union: the deliberative democracy, based in a utopia of dominion free community and the theory institutional of complementary participation in public decision, based in a discursive ethics...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2003 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/103 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/103 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Apel, Karl-Otto Habermas, Jürgen Unión Europea Democracia |
| Sumario: | Today Habermas and Apel represent two opposite position in the debate of the fate of democracy in the European Union: the deliberative democracy, based in a utopia of dominion free community and the theory institutional of complementary participation in public decision, based in a discursive ethics of common responsibility, that also is defended in the conclusion. |
|---|