Co-creation and open innovation: Systematic literature review
[EN]Open science, as a common good, opens possibilities for the dev elopment of nations, through innovations and collaborative constructions, which help to democratize knowledg e. Advances in this area are still emerging, and the open science, co-creation of knowledge and open innovat ion triangle,...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad de Salamanca (USAL) |
| Repositorio: | GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/135663 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10366/135663 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | TECHNOLOGY Open science Citizen science SOCIAL SCIENCES Knowledge Collaboration Openness Innovation Knowledge co-creation Validation Ciencia abierta Conocimiento Colaboración Apertura Innovación Co-creación de conocimiento Validación Ciencia ciudadana |
| Resumo: | [EN]Open science, as a common good, opens possibilities for the dev elopment of nations, through innovations and collaborative constructions, which help to democratize knowledg e. Advances in this area are still emerging, and the open science, co-creation of knowledge and open innovat ion triangle, is presented as an opportunity to generate an original contribut ion from research to open educ ational theory and practices. The study analyzed the articles that addressed this triangle, in order to identify the contexts and challenges that arise in open innovation and the co-creation of knowledge to promote ope n science. The method was a systematic literature review (SLR) of 168 articles published in open acces s format, from January 2014 to May 2017 in the Web of Science and Scopus datab ases. In the validation process, the York University criteria were used: inclusion and exclusion, relevanc e of the pertinent studies, ev aluation of the quality / validity of included studies and description of data / basic studies. The findings showed th at the most-widely publicized contexts were in the United States and Brazil, in the business and academic sect ors (closely followed by the social sector), and the challenges were open to innovation, opening and research. T he research concludes that the context and practices of collaboration are substantial elements for innovat ion and open science. |
|---|