Processo de projeto em empreendimentos imobiliários: avaliação de projetistas e construtores

This article presents the results of a research about the design process in real estate projects in Fortaleza, Brazil. The main objective is to describe how designers and construction engineers evaluate the design process, in order to improve the capability of understanding their expectations and ne...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Leite, Kelma Pinheiro, Barros Neto, José de Paula, Teixeira, Marino, Leite, Camila Claudino
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2015
País:Brasil
Recursos:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/66317
Acesso em linha:http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/66317
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Processo de projeto
Mercado imobiliário
Construção enxuta
Descrição
Resumo:This article presents the results of a research about the design process in real estate projects in Fortaleza, Brazil. The main objective is to describe how designers and construction engineers evaluate the design process, in order to improve the capability of understanding their expectations and needs. The perception of professionals directly linked to the production of buildings is important for the adaptation to the new BIM system deployment scenario. In addition, it is possible to note that the migration to new systems and the increase in complexity and fragmentation of the design process require new perspectives. As a result, opportunities to improve the real estate product development process were identified. This study was based on theoretical literature on lean thinking, lean design, design process, and development of real estate products. Data were collected from the application of 90 questionnaires fulfilled by designers and engineers working for developers and construction companies. The main issues of dissatisfaction identified were: rework; poor planning of real estate product development process; deadlines, and compatibility.