Responsabilidade penal da pessoa jurídica: uma proposta legal

With the evolution of the structures of the global financial market and the deterioration of other once abundant institutes, has been noticed a greater fragility of the capital scene. This fact brings to the epicenter of the world a recent deleterious (economic) reality that affects, in a single act...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Pedroso, Fernando Gentil Gizzi de Almeida
Tipo de recurso: tesis doctoral
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:Brasil
Institución:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da PUC_SP
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/45240
Acceso en línea:https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/45240
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
Direito Penal Econômico
Responsabilidade penal
Pessoas jurídicas
Economic Criminal Law
Criminal liability
Legal entities
Descripción
Sumario:With the evolution of the structures of the global financial market and the deterioration of other once abundant institutes, has been noticed a greater fragility of the capital scene. This fact brings to the epicenter of the world a recent deleterious (economic) reality that affects, in a single act, a plurality of individuals. At the heart of this problem, whether on a doctrinal or legal level, emerges the perception of companies’ ability to vilify safeguarded legal assets, as they play a central role in the production and circulation of wealth. Thus, we try to establish, through legal control bodies, standards of permitted risks. In this scenario, the criminal liability of legal entities is present in the constitutional text through two articles, with different realities: a) in Title VIII (Social order), Chapter VI (Environment), art.225, §3° CRFB, in wich there is a model of heteroresponsibility implemented by Law nº. 9.605, of February 12, 1998 and b) in Title VII (Economic and financial order), Chapter I (General principles of economic activity), art.173, §5° CRFB, where there is no responsibility model outlined by law. It turns out that, due to the absence of regulations for such harmful types, as well as due to the recent adoption by the Federal Supreme Court of a model of self-responsibility, in dissonance with the systematization then in force force for environmental crimes, it materialized, through a comparative and deductive methodology, a normative proposal for the criminal liability of collective entities