The volume and order of starting exercise modulates the glucose-lowering effect of a single session of combined exercise in middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes

Problem Statement: Although combined exercise (CE) is frequently prescribed for glycemic control of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) subjects, beginning CE session with aerobic or resistance exercises can lead to distinct responses in capillary glucose, especially when training prescriptions differ i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: João G. Silveira-Rodrigues, Dawit Albieiro Pinheiro Gonçalves, Augusto S. A. Correia, Pedro H. M. Ogando, Rodrigo S. Delevatti, Washington Pires, Ivana M. S. Aleixo, Danusa Dias Soares
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/64804
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.04132
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/64804
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2621-3330
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Concurrent exercise
Blood glucose
Training workload
Exercise volume
Exercise intensity
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus
Exercício Físico
Glicemia
Descripción
Sumario:Problem Statement: Although combined exercise (CE) is frequently prescribed for glycemic control of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) subjects, beginning CE session with aerobic or resistance exercises can lead to distinct responses in capillary glucose, especially when training prescriptions differ in intensity and volume. Approach: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of exercise intensity, volume, and order within combined exercise sessions on glycemic response. Purpose: Forty T2DM subjects participated in this study. The subjects were divided into three different protocols: standard (S-P, n = 13), high intensity (HI-P, n = 16), and high volume (HV-P, n = 11) in two counter-balanced orders each [i.e., resistance exercise followed by aerobic exercise (R-A) or vice versa (A-R)]. The capillary glucose was evaluated before and after each CE session. Results: All protocols of combined exercise reduced glucose concentrations (p < .001). HV-P induced a glycemic reduction that was 2-fold higher than that observed in HI-P (34% vs. 18%; p < .05). Both exercise orders within combined exercise session reduced glucose concentrations (S-P: 25%, 28%; HI-P: 17%, 19%, and HV-P: 31%, 36% for A-R and R-A, respectively); however, R-A induced slightly larger (Cohen’s d was 13-33% higher in R-A compared to A-R), but clinically relevant, reductions in all combined exercise protocols. Preexercise glucose concentrations were correlated to exercise-induced glucose reduction only in the A-R order (r = 65 to .79, p < .05). Conclusion: All combined exercise protocols were effective in decreasing glucose concentrations. Nonetheless, a higher magnitude of glucose-lowering effect occurred when a higher exercise volume was performed and when performing resistance instead of aerobic exercise in the first place.