Estudos pós-estruturalistas: entre aporias e contra-sensos?
This paper problematizes some of the questioning directed at the analytical field defined as poststructuralism It devotes special attention to three critiques, namely: an apology of difference – which derives from a contradictory notion of plurality and identity, total relativism – which results in...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2008 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
| Repositorio: | Educação & Realidade |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/6847 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/6847 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Foucault pós-estruturalismo discurso relativismo diferença. |
| Sumario: | This paper problematizes some of the questioning directed at the analytical field defined as poststructuralism It devotes special attention to three critiques, namely: an apology of difference – which derives from a contradictory notion of plurality and identity, total relativism – which results in the lack of distinction between good and evil, and a totalising notion of discourse – where language becomes a transcendent. This article presents arguments that refute those critiques, using Michel Foucault’s analytic perspective, in an attempt to give visibility to the construction of counter-sense, possibly inherent to intellectual work. |
|---|