Microbiological evaluation of water used in hemodialysis services in the city of Rio de Janeiro from 2016 to 2018
Introduction: The quality of water in hemodialysis services is critical in avoiding health risks in patients with renal insufficiency. Objective: To monitor the microbiological quality of treated water samples from hemodialysis services in the city of Rio de Janeiro. A total of 480 water samples wer...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
| Repositorio: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
| Idioma: | portugués inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1252 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1252 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Hemodialysis Microbiological Evaluation Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quality Hemodiálise Avaliação Microbiológica Qualidade |
| id |
BR_8344f1304b8d423b450e2b3be511d95e |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1252 |
| network_acronym_str |
BR |
| network_name_str |
Brasil |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Microbiological evaluation of water used in hemodialysis services in the city of Rio de Janeiro from 2016 to 2018 Avaliação microbiológica da água utilizada nos serviços de hemodiálise na cidade do Rio de Janeiro nos anos 2016 a 2018 |
| title |
Microbiological evaluation of water used in hemodialysis services in the city of Rio de Janeiro from 2016 to 2018 |
| spellingShingle |
Microbiological evaluation of water used in hemodialysis services in the city of Rio de Janeiro from 2016 to 2018 Jesus, Priscila Rodrigues de Hemodialysis Microbiological Evaluation Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quality Hemodiálise Avaliação Microbiológica Pseudomonas aeruginosa Qualidade |
| title_short |
Microbiological evaluation of water used in hemodialysis services in the city of Rio de Janeiro from 2016 to 2018 |
| title_full |
Microbiological evaluation of water used in hemodialysis services in the city of Rio de Janeiro from 2016 to 2018 |
| title_fullStr |
Microbiological evaluation of water used in hemodialysis services in the city of Rio de Janeiro from 2016 to 2018 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Microbiological evaluation of water used in hemodialysis services in the city of Rio de Janeiro from 2016 to 2018 |
| title_sort |
Microbiological evaluation of water used in hemodialysis services in the city of Rio de Janeiro from 2016 to 2018 |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Jesus, Priscila Rodrigues de Carmo, Juliana dos Santos Ferreira, Joana Angelica Barbosa |
| author |
Jesus, Priscila Rodrigues de |
| author_facet |
Jesus, Priscila Rodrigues de Carmo, Juliana dos Santos Ferreira, Joana Angelica Barbosa |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Carmo, Juliana dos Santos Ferreira, Joana Angelica Barbosa |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hemodialysis Microbiological Evaluation Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quality Hemodiálise Avaliação Microbiológica Pseudomonas aeruginosa Qualidade |
| topic |
Hemodialysis Microbiological Evaluation Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quality Hemodiálise Avaliação Microbiológica Pseudomonas aeruginosa Qualidade |
| description |
Introduction: The quality of water in hemodialysis services is critical in avoiding health risks in patients with renal insufficiency. Objective: To monitor the microbiological quality of treated water samples from hemodialysis services in the city of Rio de Janeiro. A total of 480 water samples were collected for microbiological analysis and 192 for endotoxin testing from 96 hemodialysis clinics between 2016 and 2018 by the Sanitary Surveillance of the city of Rio de Janeiro. Method: Methodologies described in the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia, DRC nº 11 2014 and Consolidation Ordinance nº 5, 2017. Results: Twenty percent of the microbiological analysis samples showed a high number of Heterotrophic Plate Count Bacteria (> 100 UFC/mL) and 24% of the endotoxin search (LAL) presented values above the recommended value (> 0.25 EU/mL). Seventy-eight percent of the clinics (75/96) were unsatisfactory, 41 for high BH and 34 for LAL. A total of 563 isolates were identified by confirmatory biochemical tests as: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (35.5%), Burlkolderia cepacia (21.3%), Stenotrophonomas maltophilia, (19.1%), Acinetobacter baumannii (15.1%) and Ralstonia pickettii (9.0%). Conclusions: Our results allow us to conclude that systematic monitoring of water quality in hemodialysis services is essential to provide safety and prevent health problems patients. |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-28 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1252 10.22239/2317-269X.01252 |
| url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1252 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.01252 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
| language |
por eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1252/993 https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1252/1083 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): February; 53-59 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2019): Febrero; 53-59 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 1 (2019): Fevereiro; 53-59 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
| instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
| instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
| institution |
FIOCRUZ |
| reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
| collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
| _version_ |
1853662325695840256 |
| spelling |
Microbiological evaluation of water used in hemodialysis services in the city of Rio de Janeiro from 2016 to 2018Avaliação microbiológica da água utilizada nos serviços de hemodiálise na cidade do Rio de Janeiro nos anos 2016 a 2018HemodialysisMicrobiological EvaluationPseudomonas aeruginosaQualityHemodiáliseAvaliação MicrobiológicaPseudomonas aeruginosaQualidadeIntroduction: The quality of water in hemodialysis services is critical in avoiding health risks in patients with renal insufficiency. Objective: To monitor the microbiological quality of treated water samples from hemodialysis services in the city of Rio de Janeiro. A total of 480 water samples were collected for microbiological analysis and 192 for endotoxin testing from 96 hemodialysis clinics between 2016 and 2018 by the Sanitary Surveillance of the city of Rio de Janeiro. Method: Methodologies described in the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia, DRC nº 11 2014 and Consolidation Ordinance nº 5, 2017. Results: Twenty percent of the microbiological analysis samples showed a high number of Heterotrophic Plate Count Bacteria (> 100 UFC/mL) and 24% of the endotoxin search (LAL) presented values above the recommended value (> 0.25 EU/mL). Seventy-eight percent of the clinics (75/96) were unsatisfactory, 41 for high BH and 34 for LAL. A total of 563 isolates were identified by confirmatory biochemical tests as: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (35.5%), Burlkolderia cepacia (21.3%), Stenotrophonomas maltophilia, (19.1%), Acinetobacter baumannii (15.1%) and Ralstonia pickettii (9.0%). Conclusions: Our results allow us to conclude that systematic monitoring of water quality in hemodialysis services is essential to provide safety and prevent health problems patients.Introdução: A qualidade da água nos serviços de hemodiálise é fundamental para evitar riscos à saúde de pacientes com insuficiência renal. Objetivo: Monitorar a qualidade microbiológica de amostras de água tratada de serviços de hemodiálise, na cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Foram coletadas 480 amostras para análise microbiológica (cinco pontos de coleta) e 192 para pesquisa de endotoxinas (dois pontos) nas inspeções de 96 clínicas de hemodiálise, entre 2016 e 2018, pela Vigilância Sanitária do município do Rio de Janeiro. Método: Metodologias descritas na Farmacopeia Brasileira, na RDC nº 11/2014 e na Portaria de Consolidação nº 5/2017. Resultados: Vinte por cento de amostras do ensaio microbiológico apresentaram número elevado de bactérias aeróbias (> 100 UFC/mL) e 24% das amostras da análise de endotoxinas (LAL) apresentaram valores acima do preconizado (> 0,25 EU/mL). Setenta e oito por cento das clínicas (75/96) foram insatisfatórias, 41 por apresentarem alta contagem de bactérias heterotróficas e 34 pela detecção de endotoxinas pelo LAL. Foram identificados 563 isolados por testes bioquímicos confirmatórios, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (35,5%), Burlkolderia cepacia (21,3%), Stenotrophonomas maltophilia, (19,1%), Acinetobacter baumannii (15,1%) e Ralstonia pickettii (9,0%). Conclusões: Nossos resultados nos permitem concluir que o monitoramento sistemático da qualidade da água nos serviços de hemodiálise é essencial para proporcionar segurança e evitar agravos à saúde de pacientes.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2019-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/125210.22239/2317-269X.01252Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): February; 53-59Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2019): Febrero; 53-59Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 7 n. 1 (2019): Fevereiro; 53-592317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZporenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1252/993https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/1252/1083Copyright (c) 2019 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJesus, Priscila Rodrigues deCarmo, Juliana dos SantosFerreira, Joana Angelica Barbosa2023-06-27T16:49:42Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/1252Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T16:49:42Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
| score |
15,228081 |