Nietzsche as a heretic of Schopenhauer School
According to the systematic classification of the Schopenhauer School that has now become canonical, followers of Schopenhauer who do not accept the metaphysics of the will and who independently develop other aspects of Schopenhauerian thought are considered heretics. This is precisely the case of F...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
| Repositorio: | Voluntas - Revista Internacional de Filosofia (Santa Maria) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/89375 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/voluntas/article/view/89375 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Schopenhauer Escola de Schopenhauer Os heréticos Nietzsche Schopenhauer School The heretics |
| Sumario: | According to the systematic classification of the Schopenhauer School that has now become canonical, followers of Schopenhauer who do not accept the metaphysics of the will and who independently develop other aspects of Schopenhauerian thought are considered heretics. This is precisely the case of Friedrich Nietzsche, who, although he considered Schopenhauer his “teacher and disciplinarian”, was never an uncritical Schopenhauerian. This contribution therefore aims to criticize the traditional interpretation, which sees the first Nietzsche as an orthodox Schopenhauerian and the second Nietzsche as an anti-Schopenhauerian, and to show how the three phases in which Nietzsche’s thought is articulated correspond to three different approaches to Schopenhauerian thought. |
|---|