Eventos de educação médica online na perspectiva de médicos, professores e estudantes de medicina
Digital interactive technologies (DIT) were widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure the holding of continuing medical education events. Objective: to analyze, from the perspective of physicians, medical students, and faculties, how they perceived and experienced participation in online me...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | tesis de maestría |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da PUC_SP |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucsp.br:handle/44230 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/44230 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE Educação médica Educação em saúde Ensino online Educação médica continuada Tecnologia digital Medical education Health education Online learning Continuing medical education Digital technology |
| Resumo: | Digital interactive technologies (DIT) were widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure the holding of continuing medical education events. Objective: to analyze, from the perspective of physicians, medical students, and faculties, how they perceived and experienced participation in online medical events mediated by DIT and what influence this new trend in continuing medical education had during this period. Methods: a quantitative, exploratory, and analytical study. Active physicians, medical students, and faculty members from different institutions participated in the study. The 418 participants answered an online semi-structured questionnaire to collect their perceptions and experiences as assistants, speakers, or presenters in continuing medical education events throughout the pandemic. Results: The age of the participants was 41.3 ± 15.8 years (mean ± SD); 47.1% were female, 25.1% were students, and 25.8% were medical professors. Among the participants, 92.3% agreed that DIT facilitated access to medical updates during the pandemic. There was a significantly greater number of participants as assistants in all continuing education activities (p<0.01) and as speakers or exhibitors, there was a more significant number of participants only in courses (p<0.05) and video classes/webinars during the pandemic (p<0.001). For the majority, participation in conferences and classes/updates was mixed with regular activities; the DTI implemented during the pandemic was positive in the sense of improving knowledge and professional performance (p<0.001); DIT facilitated relationships between professionals and students in the medical field (p<0.0001), and there is disagreement that online conferences are better than in-person ones (p<0.001). The open-ended questions reveal more factors that favor than hinder participation in DIT-mediated continuing education events. Conclusion: this study showed that, in the view of doctors, students and medical faculties, the advancement of DIT during the pandemic ensured the maintenance of continuing medical education events, with advantages and disadvantages for participants, with an increase in the number of participations in these educational activities and increased the willingness to hold hybrid events, to meet the preferences of professionals and students who choose to participate in person or online |
|---|