The control of legislative omissions by the Bundesverfassungsgericht.
Abstract. The author is based on the assumption that “The Federal Republic of Germany is not only a stable democracy, but it has achieved the status of Rule of Law and can defend itself”, and then analyzes legislative omissions in the case law of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. Starting...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Uruguay |
| Recursos: | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| Repositorio: | LIBERI |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/7135 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/826 https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7135 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | constitutional law legislation germany unconstitutionality derecho constitucional legislación Alemania inconstitucionalidad |
| Resumo: | Abstract. The author is based on the assumption that “The Federal Republic of Germany is not only a stable democracy, but it has achieved the status of Rule of Law and can defend itself”, and then analyzes legislative omissions in the case law of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. Starting from the early times of the Court, when its position was against supervising omissions, this paper analyzes their evolution from the first procedural instruments to the sentence of December 19, 1951 and pauses at a transcendent contribution: the arbitrary exclusion of a benefit and the different types of sentences, even declarations of unconstitutionality without a ruling of nullity and their interpretation according to the Constitution. |
|---|