Cláusulas anticorrupción y contratación pública: especial referencia al caso de los consorcios de empresas

This article examines the inclusion of anticorruption clauses in Peruvian state contracts introduced following the Lava Jato case in 2017.These clauses seek to ensure integrity by requiring contractors to declare that they have not engaged in corrupt acts and to adopt preventive measures.However, th...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Reaño Peschiera, José Leandro
Tipo de documento: artigo
Data de publicação:2024
País:Perú
Recursos:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositório:PUCP-Institucional
Idioma:espanhol
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/203738
Acesso em linha:https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/31019/27450
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/203738
https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202402.007
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Anti-corruption clauses
State contracts
Consortia
Joint liability
Procurement Law
Cláusulas anticorrupción
Contratos estatales
Consorcios
Responsabilidad solidaria
Ley de Contrataciones
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01
Descrição
Resumo:This article examines the inclusion of anticorruption clauses in Peruvian state contracts introduced following the Lava Jato case in 2017.These clauses seek to ensure integrity by requiring contractors to declare that they have not engaged in corrupt acts and to adopt preventive measures.However, their application in contracts with consortia generates conflicts, since each member must assume joint liability for violations by others.Differences are explored between concession contracts, which require a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), and license contracts, where the consortium maintains its legal autonomy, highlighting the need for a consistent application of these clauses to respect the associative structure and liability rules.