Towards a Peruvian Critical Deontology: The Reflection of Antonio Cornejo Polar and Raúl Bueno Chávez on the Work of Literary Criticism in Peru
This paper aims to explore and argue that in Peruvian literary criticism there is a tradition of reflection on its function. To this end, the critical work of Antonio Cornejo Polar and Raúl Bueno Chávez will be analyzed on the basis of “critical deontology”, a category that tracks the duties and pri...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe:article/20841 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/revistaLetras/article/view/20841 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Crítica literaria latinoamericana Deontología crítica literaria Antonio Cornejo Polar Raúl Bueno Chávez Latin American literary criticism Literary critical deontology |
| Sumario: | This paper aims to explore and argue that in Peruvian literary criticism there is a tradition of reflection on its function. To this end, the critical work of Antonio Cornejo Polar and Raúl Bueno Chávez will be analyzed on the basis of “critical deontology”, a category that tracks the duties and principles that literary critics maintain are necessary when performing their function. Therefore, this paper reviews Peruvian literary criticism, and in particular the works of Antonio Cornejo Polar and Raúl Bueno Chávez, from a deontological valuation. There are three commonalities between the authors proposals: first, to consider the social situation as an essential element in the critical activity, since Peru presents a multicultural and multilingual reality; second, to dominate disciplines close to literature, such as sociology, history, anthropology, philosophy, linguistics, etc., in order to broaden the interpretative dimension of literary criticism. Finally, the authors recognize that critical activity is also a political and ideological action that takes shape through dimensions that go beyond their personal experience, since it includes training and professional relationships that delimit the spaces for future research. |
|---|