El deber de negociar y el arbitraje potestativo como parte del contenido del derecho constitucional de negociación colectiva
This work studies constitutional bases of two essential institutions of Collective Labor Law: employer’s obligation to negotiate collectively and facultative arbitration. In relation to the first one, using tools provided bythe Theory of Law, it is argued that the section 28º of Peruvian Constitutio...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Data de publicação: | 2013 |
| País: | Perú |
| Recursos: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositório: | PUCP-Institucional |
| Idioma: | espanhol |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/115917 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/8905/9310 https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201302.011 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Negociación colectiva Deber de negociar Pretensión Permiso Arbitraje potestativo Buena fe Medios pacíficos de solución de controversias https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00 |
| Resumo: | This work studies constitutional bases of two essential institutions of Collective Labor Law: employer’s obligation to negotiate collectively and facultative arbitration. In relation to the first one, using tools provided bythe Theory of Law, it is argued that the section 28º of Peruvian Constitution establishes a collective negotiation concept as claim (not as permission) so, employers legal obligation of collective negotiation is constitutional. In theother hand, regarding facultative arbitration, it has constitutional support on state’s obligation to promote pacific ways to labor conflicts; even though, it is questioned that a «sub constitutional» rule has restrictively regulated this institution. |
|---|