Dos tesis de H.L.A. Hart sobre responsabilidad y castigo: 50 años después
In this paper we make a critical assessment of some claims made by H.L.A. Hart in his book Punishment and Responsibility. Particularly, two specific theses on responsibility and punishment are addressed: the primacy of liability thesis and the mixed character of the justification of punishment thesi...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | Perú |
| Recursos: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | PUCP-Institucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/136472 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/20429/20345 http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/20429/22377 https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201802.001 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Responsabilidad Sujeción Filosofía del derecho penal Castigo H.L.A. Hart https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00 |
| Resumo: | In this paper we make a critical assessment of some claims made by H.L.A. Hart in his book Punishment and Responsibility. Particularly, two specific theses on responsibility and punishment are addressed: the primacy of liability thesis and the mixed character of the justification of punishment thesis. We introduce both theses and we analyze their explanatory potential through scrutiny of criticisms they have faced. |
|---|