Political praxis and morality in Machiavelli’s Prince
The main problem of this research raises the fact that the prince’s scholars argue, to a greater or lesser extent, that the thesis Machiavelli recommended the immorality as a general principle in political praxis. Our objective is to determine if Machiavelli recommended the immorality as a general p...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.unife.edu.pe:article/3182 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/lumen/article/view/3182 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | naturaleza humana praxis pol´ıtica poder inmoralidad human nature political praxis power immorality |
| Sumario: | The main problem of this research raises the fact that the prince’s scholars argue, to a greater or lesser extent, that the thesis Machiavelli recommended the immorality as a general principle in political praxis. Our objective is to determine if Machiavelli recommended the immorality as a general principle in political praxis. Our hypothesis is that Machiavelli didn’t recommend the immorality as a general principle in political praxis. That is, the father of political science recommended that in political praxis morality should be the rule and immorality should be the exception. |
|---|