Evaluation of therapeutic management in undergraduates students, graduates and teachers in teeth with molar-incisor hypomineralization (HIH) from a private university of Lima
Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic management most chosen by undergraduate students, graduates and teachers of a private University of Lima in dental pieces with HIM.Materials and methods: In this study worked with 151 participants, being undergraduate students, graduates and teachers between th...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | Perú |
| Recursos: | Sociedad Peruana de Odontopediatría |
| Repositorio: | Odontología pediátrica |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:op.spo.com.pe:article/132 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/132 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Hipomineralización del esmalte Hipomineralización molar e incisiva HIM Enamel Hypomineralization Molar incisor hypomineralization MIH |
| Resumo: | Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic management most chosen by undergraduate students, graduates and teachers of a private University of Lima in dental pieces with HIM.Materials and methods: In this study worked with 151 participants, being undergraduate students, graduates and teachers between the ages of 20 and 42 of a Private University in Chorrillos, Lima-Peru. A questionnaire was applied which was subdivided into 2 phases: type of material and type of cavitary preparation with 3 cases of HIM with different severity. For the univariate analysis, the descriptive statistics, absolute and relative frequencies were analyzed. For bivariate analysis, the Chi square test was performed (P <0.05). Results: In case 1, the treatment of choice by all respondents was “glass ionomer fissure sealants”. In case 2, the treatment of choice was “preformed crown”. In case 3, there were differences in the choice of cavity preparation”, In addition, there was a significant difference between the level of training with therapeutic management (p = 0,000). Conclusions: Based on the results, it is possible to conclude that differences were found in the therapeutic management between the three groups of participants in the cases of MIH. |
|---|