Desempeño en aula de instructores, el punto de vista de los participantes
The differences between the variables and items were evaluated in the Civic Education andDemocratic Education Course through a survey, as well as the reliability of it using theKruskal-Wallis test, correlation coefficient and the Cronbach alpha coefficient. Significant differenceson the performance...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2012 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD DE GUANAJUATO |
| Repositorio: | Acta Universitaria |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.actauniversitaria.ugto.mx:article/382 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.actauniversitaria.ugto.mx/index.php/acta/article/view/382 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Evaluación instructores confiabilidad encuesta. Evaluation instructors reliability survey. |
| Sumario: | The differences between the variables and items were evaluated in the Civic Education andDemocratic Education Course through a survey, as well as the reliability of it using theKruskal-Wallis test, correlation coefficient and the Cronbach alpha coefficient. Significant differenceson the performance in classroom between instructors and variables were found. The“learning development” variable was different, as “planning and unit evaluation” along with“didactic implementation” were statistically the same. The items with greater problems were“creativity and innovation”, “team-work”, “problem solving”, “essay writing” and “respect forthe ideas of others”. The survey exhibited high reliability levels. Therefore, it is required toupdate the instructors and to reduce the number of items. |
|---|