Reactive Multilateralism in Central Asia Versus China and Russia.

It is well known that Central Asia is one of the zones in which geopoli­tics acquires great importance in current international relations either be­cause of its strategic natural resources or because it is the route that connects East Asia with West Asia and Europe. In spite of this, Central Asia ha...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Tzili-Apango, Eduardo, Palacios-Cabrera, Eduardo
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2018
País:México
Recursos:EL COLEGIO DE MÉXICO
Repositório:Foro Internacional
Idioma:espanhol
OAI Identifier:oai:oai.forointernacional.colmex.mx:article/2463
Acesso em linha:https://forointernacional.colmex.mx/index.php/fi/article/view/2463
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Central Asia
China
Russia
Multilateralism
Silk Route
Asia Central
multilateralismo
Rusia
Ruta de la Seda
Descrição
Resumo:It is well known that Central Asia is one of the zones in which geopoli­tics acquires great importance in current international relations either be­cause of its strategic natural resources or because it is the route that connects East Asia with West Asia and Europe. In spite of this, Central Asia has been tagged as one of the most conflictive zones given the convergence and the cor­relation of regional and extra-regional forces. In this line of thinking, it is ar­gued that power imbalances caused by extra-regional powers and non-state actors have driven an institutionalization and multilateralization process exe­cuted by the regional actors since the nineties. This reactive multilateralism is an answer to extra-regional and inter-regional aftermath actions in Central Asia. Nevertheless, it also promotes the consolidation of the regional powers’ inter­ests in the area, especially due to secure the supply of energy resources and to consolidate trade routes. In this process, China and Russia have played an im­portant role, although without being able to establish a regional hegemony both because of the divergence in politics and interests between them and because of the presence of other actors with significant regional influence.