The criteria of dominance and congruence in the development of constitutional jurisprudence in Bolivia
The objective of this paper is to develop in an analytical and critical manner the functionality of the highest jurisprudential standard, as a criterion for the protection and implementation of the protection of Fundamental Rights, but not as a tool to establish and systematize valid constitutional...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | México |
| Recursos: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18886 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derecho-comparado/article/view/18886 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | jurisprudencia precedente Constitución jurisprudence precedent Constitution |
| Resumo: | The objective of this paper is to develop in an analytical and critical manner the functionality of the highest jurisprudential standard, as a criterion for the protection and implementation of the protection of Fundamental Rights, but not as a tool to establish and systematize valid constitutional precedents or in force, for which, in parallel, dominance and congruence will be established as suitable and suitable criteria for the identification and systematization of valid constitutional precedent. |
|---|