Electoral abstentionism is not a right
Electoral abstentionism is harmful to democratic countries, unfortunately, it is increasingly occurring. This practice is adopted, as a form of disagree-ment, however, it is not a right; therefore, the objective is to show that elec-toral abstentionism is not the most efficient option to manifest di...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD DE GUADALAJARA |
| Repositorio: | InterNaciones |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:internaciones.cucsh.udg.mx:article/7254 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://internaciones.cucsh.udg.mx/index.php/inter/article/view/7254 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Electoral Abstentionism Democracy Citizen Participation Law Annulled Ballot Abstencionismo Electoral Democracia Participación Ciudadana Derecho Voto Anulado Abstencionismo Eleitoral, Democracia, Participação Cidadã, Direito, Voto Anulado. |
| Sumario: | Electoral abstentionism is harmful to democratic countries, unfortunately, it is increasingly occurring. This practice is adopted, as a form of disagree-ment, however, it is not a right; therefore, the objective is to show that elec-toral abstentionism is not the most efficient option to manifest disagreement with governments nor does it have effects of change. The foregoing with a methodology where a data collection technique from a documentary source was applied mainly in cybernetic media, under the criteria of using only information with a scientific precedent and with no more than 5 years of publication. The information collected was subjected to an analysis of quali-tative results, where the content was examined in four phases, categorizing democratic and “mixed” countries; structuring those that force voting and those that do not, later contrasting them and concluding that there are more efficient citizen participation practices as means of protest. |
|---|