Student ratings to evaluate the teaching effectiveness: Factors should be considered

[EN] The study discusses the student ratings of a professor teaching sociology disciplines in different undergraduate courses. The data were obtained from questionnaires consisting of a series of inquiries about the discipline, focusing on how it fits in the curricular structure (discipline evaluati...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Ribeiro, Marcelo, Coelho, Lia
Formato: capítulo de livro
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
Repositorio:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/124350
Acesso em linha:https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/124350
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Higher Education
Learning
Educational systems
Teaching
Course evaluation
Teaching evaluation
id ES_fb848e72a6b0fb6ee00e16e8c1f7e564
oai_identifier_str oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/124350
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Student ratings to evaluate the teaching effectiveness: Factors should be consideredRibeiro, MarceloCoelho, LiaHigher EducationLearningEducational systemsTeachingCourse evaluationTeaching evaluation[EN] The study discusses the student ratings of a professor teaching sociology disciplines in different undergraduate courses. The data were obtained from questionnaires consisting of a series of inquiries about the discipline, focusing on how it fits in the curricular structure (discipline evaluation) and, also, on teacher’s performance (professor evaluation). A total of 480 students answered the questionnaire and, for each question they had a total of five possible answers: very poor (1 point), poor (2 points), fair (3 points), good (4 points) and excellent (5 points). Considering discipline and professor evaluations, students from Animal Science, Food Engineering and Veterinary Medicine courses consider "fair" the performance of the sociology professor. Regarding to the professor evaluation, the students of the three undergraduate courses considered the performance of the teacher "good". For discipline evaluation, the Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine students considered the discipline "fair" and the Food Engineering students considered the discipline "poor". The results obtained can serve as a basis for the design of a institutional evaluation system of teaching based on student ratings, however the evaluation of the discipline and the performance of the teacher must be considered separately.Editorial Universitat Politècnica de ValènciaRepositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politècnica de València Riunet20192019-07-05book parthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartapplication/pdfhttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/124350reponame:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valénciainstname:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:riunet.upv.es:10251/1243502026-06-13T07:49:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Student ratings to evaluate the teaching effectiveness: Factors should be considered
title Student ratings to evaluate the teaching effectiveness: Factors should be considered
spellingShingle Student ratings to evaluate the teaching effectiveness: Factors should be considered
Ribeiro, Marcelo
Higher Education
Learning
Educational systems
Teaching
Course evaluation
Teaching evaluation
title_short Student ratings to evaluate the teaching effectiveness: Factors should be considered
title_full Student ratings to evaluate the teaching effectiveness: Factors should be considered
title_fullStr Student ratings to evaluate the teaching effectiveness: Factors should be considered
title_full_unstemmed Student ratings to evaluate the teaching effectiveness: Factors should be considered
title_sort Student ratings to evaluate the teaching effectiveness: Factors should be considered
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Marcelo
Coelho, Lia
author Ribeiro, Marcelo
author_facet Ribeiro, Marcelo
Coelho, Lia
author_role author
author2 Coelho, Lia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politècnica de València Riunet
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Higher Education
Learning
Educational systems
Teaching
Course evaluation
Teaching evaluation
topic Higher Education
Learning
Educational systems
Teaching
Course evaluation
Teaching evaluation
description [EN] The study discusses the student ratings of a professor teaching sociology disciplines in different undergraduate courses. The data were obtained from questionnaires consisting of a series of inquiries about the discipline, focusing on how it fits in the curricular structure (discipline evaluation) and, also, on teacher’s performance (professor evaluation). A total of 480 students answered the questionnaire and, for each question they had a total of five possible answers: very poor (1 point), poor (2 points), fair (3 points), good (4 points) and excellent (5 points). Considering discipline and professor evaluations, students from Animal Science, Food Engineering and Veterinary Medicine courses consider "fair" the performance of the sociology professor. Regarding to the professor evaluation, the students of the three undergraduate courses considered the performance of the teacher "good". For discipline evaluation, the Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine students considered the discipline "fair" and the Food Engineering students considered the discipline "poor". The results obtained can serve as a basis for the design of a institutional evaluation system of teaching based on student ratings, however the evaluation of the discipline and the performance of the teacher must be considered separately.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-07-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv book part
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
format bookPart
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/124350
url https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/124350
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
instname:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
instname_str Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
reponame_str RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
collection RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869425336194695168
score 15,228081

Registos relacionados