El control de la valoración de la prueba en segunda instancia: inmediación e inferencias probatorias = Control of the evaluation of the evidence in the second instance: immediacy and evidentiary inferences
This article analyzes the relationship between the principle of immediacy and the control of evidentiary reasoning in the second instance. It shows the scope of control that can be carried out on the quality of the evidentiary reasoning without affecting the principle of immediacy, properly understo...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10256/25026 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10256/25026 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Dret processal Procedure (Law) Prova (Dret) Evidence (Law) Dret -- Metodologia Law -- Methodology |
| Sumario: | This article analyzes the relationship between the principle of immediacy and the control of evidentiary reasoning in the second instance. It shows the scope of control that can be carried out on the quality of the evidentiary reasoning without affecting the principle of immediacy, properly understood. To do this, a irst instance criminal sentence is examined, indicating the different steps in the reasoning about the facts it contains and how its shortcomings can be reviewed |
|---|