The resistant effect of slurs: A nonpropositional, presuppositional account
The aim of this paper is to account for the resistance to cancelation, rejection, and retraction exhibited by slurs. The kind of explanation we offer is a presuppositional one. Like the most recent presuppositional accounts, moreover, ours is a nonpropositional presuppositional proposal. Our view is...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad de Murcia |
| Repositorio: | DIGITUM. Depósito Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Murcia |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digitum.um.es:10201/142525 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon.360561 http://hdl.handle.net/10201/142525 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Slurs Resistance Cancelation Rejection Retraction Presupposition Resistencia Cancelación Rechazo Retractación Presuposición CDU::1 - Filosofía y psicología |
| Resumo: | The aim of this paper is to account for the resistance to cancelation, rejection, and retraction exhibited by slurs. The kind of explanation we offer is a presuppositional one. Like the most recent presuppositional accounts, moreover, ours is a nonpropositional presuppositional proposal. Our view is that, to be felicitous, utterances of sentences featuring slurs require certain components to be part of the common ground, but these components are not propositions, but worldorderings. |
|---|