I don't understand how I feel

Introduction: Childhood adversity is associated with the severity of multiple dimensions of psychosis, but the mechanisms underpinning the close link between the two constructs is unclear. Mentalization may underlie this relationship, as impaired mentalizing is found in various stages of the psychos...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Nonweiler, Jacqueline Grace|||0000-0003-1851-7844, Torrecilla González, Pilar|||0000-0003-2017-6014, Kwapil, Thomas|||0000-0003-1116-5954, Ballespí Sola, Sergi|||0000-0002-6584-4138, Barrantes Vidal, Neus|||0000-0002-8671-1238
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:296456
Acesso em linha:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/296456
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1268247
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Childhood adversity
Mentalization
Paranoia
Parental loss
Psychotic-like experiences
Schizotypy
Self-other
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Descrição
Resumo:Introduction: Childhood adversity is associated with the severity of multiple dimensions of psychosis, but the mechanisms underpinning the close link between the two constructs is unclear. Mentalization may underlie this relationship, as impaired mentalizing is found in various stages of the psychosis continuum. Nonetheless, the differential roles of self-and other-mentalizing in psychosis are not well understood. Methods: Parallel multiple mediation was conducted for the relationship between a diverse range of childhood adversity types, including intentional and nonintentional harm, and schizotypy (positive, negative, disorganized), psychotic-like experiences (PLE) and paranoia via self-mentalizing (attention to emotions and emotional clarity) and other-mentalizing in n = 1,156 nonclinically ascertained young adults. Results: Significant parallel multiple mediation models were found for all psychotic outcomes except negative schizotypy. The associations between intentionally harmful childhood adversity and psychotic outcomes were significantly mediated by increased attention to emotions for most models and decreased emotional clarity for some models. No significant mediation was found for parental loss. Paternal abuse was only mediated by attention to emotions whereas the effects of maternal abuse were mediated by attention to emotions and emotional clarity. Other-mentalizing only showed mediating effects on one of thirty models tested. Conclusion: Results highlight the mediating role of impaired self-mentalizing in the association between childhood adversity and psychosis. This is consistent with disturbances of self-concept and self-boundary characterizing, in particular, the positive dimension of psychosis. Maternal versus paternal figures may contribute differentially to the development of mentalizing. These results could inform future preventative interventions, focusing on the development and maintenance of self-mentalizing.