Predicting beef carcass fatness using an image analysis system

The amount and distribution of subcutaneous fat is an important factor affecting beef carcass quality. The degree of fatness is determined by visual assessments scored on a scale of five fatness levels (the SEUROP system). New technologies such as the image analysis method have been developed and ap...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Mendizábal Aizpuru, José Antonio, Ripoll, Guillermo (000-0001-8042-8688), Urrutia Vera, Olaia, Insausti Barrenetxea, Kizkitza, Soret Lafraya, Beatriz, Arana Navarro, Ana
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2021
Country:España
Institution:Universidad Pública de Navarra
Repository:Academica-e. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra
OAI Identifier:oai:academica-e.unavarra.es:2454/42719
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2454/42719
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Carcass fatness
Image analysis
Prediction
Young bulls
Description
Summary:The amount and distribution of subcutaneous fat is an important factor affecting beef carcass quality. The degree of fatness is determined by visual assessments scored on a scale of five fatness levels (the SEUROP system). New technologies such as the image analysis method have been developed and applied in an effort to enhance the accuracy and objectivity of this classification system. In this study, 50 young bulls were slaughtered (570 ± 52.5 kg) and after slaughter the carcasses were weighed (360 ± 33.1 kg) and a SEUROP system fatness score assigned. A digital picture of the outer surface of the left side of the carcass was taken and the area of fat cover (fat area) was measured using an image analysis system. Commercial cutting of the carcasses was performed 24 h post-mortem. The fat trimmed away on cutting (cutting fat) was weighed. A regression analysis was carried out for the carcass cutting fat (y-axis) on the carcass fat area (x-axis) to establish the accuracy of the image analysis system. A greater accuracy was obtained by the image analysis (R2 = 0.72; p < 0.001) than from the visual fatness scores (R2 = 0.66; p > 0.001). These results show the image analysis to be more accurate than the visual assessment system for predicting beef carcass fatness.