Unveiling human–wildlife interactions in the context of livestock grazing abandonment and the return of large carnivores, ungulates and vultures: A stakeholder perspective
Pastoral practices remain a widespread economic activity across European mountain regions. However, the viability of this activity may be threatened by the recovery of large wild vertebrates associated with passive rewilding, leading to the so-called human–wildlife conflicts. Reconciling the return...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad Autónoma de Madrid |
| Repositorio: | Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/717291 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10486/717291 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10769 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Coexistence Human–Wildlife Conflict Interdisciplinary Approach Land Abandonment Passive Rewilding Pastoral Systems Social Perceptions and Discourses Biología y Biomedicina / Biología |
| id |
ES_e51a6948192f4b4b0b7dd227815ea9e8 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/717291 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Unveiling human–wildlife interactions in the context of livestock grazing abandonment and the return of large carnivores, ungulates and vultures: A stakeholder perspective |
| title |
Unveiling human–wildlife interactions in the context of livestock grazing abandonment and the return of large carnivores, ungulates and vultures: A stakeholder perspective |
| spellingShingle |
Unveiling human–wildlife interactions in the context of livestock grazing abandonment and the return of large carnivores, ungulates and vultures: A stakeholder perspective Acebes Vives, Pablo Coexistence Human–Wildlife Conflict Interdisciplinary Approach Land Abandonment Passive Rewilding Pastoral Systems Social Perceptions and Discourses Biología y Biomedicina / Biología |
| title_short |
Unveiling human–wildlife interactions in the context of livestock grazing abandonment and the return of large carnivores, ungulates and vultures: A stakeholder perspective |
| title_full |
Unveiling human–wildlife interactions in the context of livestock grazing abandonment and the return of large carnivores, ungulates and vultures: A stakeholder perspective |
| title_fullStr |
Unveiling human–wildlife interactions in the context of livestock grazing abandonment and the return of large carnivores, ungulates and vultures: A stakeholder perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Unveiling human–wildlife interactions in the context of livestock grazing abandonment and the return of large carnivores, ungulates and vultures: A stakeholder perspective |
| title_sort |
Unveiling human–wildlife interactions in the context of livestock grazing abandonment and the return of large carnivores, ungulates and vultures: A stakeholder perspective |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Acebes Vives, Pablo Muñoz Gálvez, Francisco Javier Iglesias González, Zuriñe García Llorente, Marina López-García, Daniel |
| author |
Acebes Vives, Pablo |
| author_facet |
Acebes Vives, Pablo Muñoz Gálvez, Francisco Javier Iglesias González, Zuriñe García Llorente, Marina López-García, Daniel |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Muñoz Gálvez, Francisco Javier Iglesias González, Zuriñe García Llorente, Marina López-García, Daniel |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Ecología Facultad de Ciencias |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Coexistence Human–Wildlife Conflict Interdisciplinary Approach Land Abandonment Passive Rewilding Pastoral Systems Social Perceptions and Discourses Biología y Biomedicina / Biología |
| topic |
Coexistence Human–Wildlife Conflict Interdisciplinary Approach Land Abandonment Passive Rewilding Pastoral Systems Social Perceptions and Discourses Biología y Biomedicina / Biología |
| description |
Pastoral practices remain a widespread economic activity across European mountain regions. However, the viability of this activity may be threatened by the recovery of large wild vertebrates associated with passive rewilding, leading to the so-called human–wildlife conflicts. Reconciling the return of large wild vertebrates and pastoral practices is therefore a major challenge for the European Union (EU), as it poses political, socio-economic and conservation challenges. We analyse the social dimension of the recovery of large carnivores, ungulates and strict avian scavengers, through a multi-stakeholder approach in two rural territories in central Spain exposed to different degrees of land abandonment. Based on in-depth interviews, we identify potential conflicts and disagreements between the different stakeholders, search for strategies to promote the coexistence of large wild vertebrates and extensive grazing systems and seek emergent discourses for reconciling and boosting agrarian production and biodiversity conservation. Our findings show a consensus among stakeholders on the general increase and recovery of large wild vertebrate populations. We then collected divergent positions on what this recovery means for social groups, showing opposing views between urban and rural people; while conservationists considered this increase positively, land users generally—but not always—perceived this recovery as a threat to their livelihoods. We identified disagreements within social groups and divergent positions displayed between cattle farmers and sheep and goat farmers. The latter showed forms of management closer to agroecological visions, thus allowing coexistence. The coexistence of pastoral practices and wild vertebrates involves navigating a complex interplay of ecological, social and economic factors. The negative impacts of wildlife on livestock can be minimized, but only through the collective implementation of measures by all parties. Furthermore, the recognition and valuation of pastoral practices and the empowerment of land users may facilitate coexistence. Mutual recognition and participation of local stakeholders seems an unavoidable step in developing more collaborative approaches that respect the needs and aspirations of rural communities while contributing to the EU's restoration and conservation goals. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024 2024-12-23 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
research article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 VoR http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10486/717291 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10769 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10486/717291 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10769 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés eng |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
open access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
open access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM instname:Universidad Autónoma de Madrid |
| instname_str |
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid |
| reponame_str |
Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM |
| collection |
Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869422649924386816 |
| spelling |
Unveiling human–wildlife interactions in the context of livestock grazing abandonment and the return of large carnivores, ungulates and vultures: A stakeholder perspectiveAcebes Vives, PabloMuñoz Gálvez, Francisco JavierIglesias González, ZuriñeGarcía Llorente, MarinaLópez-García, DanielCoexistenceHuman–Wildlife ConflictInterdisciplinary ApproachLand AbandonmentPassive RewildingPastoral SystemsSocial Perceptions and DiscoursesBiología y Biomedicina / BiologíaPastoral practices remain a widespread economic activity across European mountain regions. However, the viability of this activity may be threatened by the recovery of large wild vertebrates associated with passive rewilding, leading to the so-called human–wildlife conflicts. Reconciling the return of large wild vertebrates and pastoral practices is therefore a major challenge for the European Union (EU), as it poses political, socio-economic and conservation challenges. We analyse the social dimension of the recovery of large carnivores, ungulates and strict avian scavengers, through a multi-stakeholder approach in two rural territories in central Spain exposed to different degrees of land abandonment. Based on in-depth interviews, we identify potential conflicts and disagreements between the different stakeholders, search for strategies to promote the coexistence of large wild vertebrates and extensive grazing systems and seek emergent discourses for reconciling and boosting agrarian production and biodiversity conservation. Our findings show a consensus among stakeholders on the general increase and recovery of large wild vertebrate populations. We then collected divergent positions on what this recovery means for social groups, showing opposing views between urban and rural people; while conservationists considered this increase positively, land users generally—but not always—perceived this recovery as a threat to their livelihoods. We identified disagreements within social groups and divergent positions displayed between cattle farmers and sheep and goat farmers. The latter showed forms of management closer to agroecological visions, thus allowing coexistence. The coexistence of pastoral practices and wild vertebrates involves navigating a complex interplay of ecological, social and economic factors. The negative impacts of wildlife on livestock can be minimized, but only through the collective implementation of measures by all parties. Furthermore, the recognition and valuation of pastoral practices and the empowerment of land users may facilitate coexistence. Mutual recognition and participation of local stakeholders seems an unavoidable step in developing more collaborative approaches that respect the needs and aspirations of rural communities while contributing to the EU's restoration and conservation goals. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blogThe authors wish to deeply thank all interviewees who participatedin the study, and three anonymous reviewers. We would also liketo thank the REMEDINAL TE project (P2018/EMT-4338; Madrid Regional Government and EU Social Fund). This study also represents a contribution to the “Interdisciplinary Thematic Platform AGRIAMBIO”, around the agreement between CSIC and the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food for the impact assessment of the Spanish National Strategic Plan of the European Common Agricultural Policy (2023–2027). This work was carried out with the support of the PID2022-142096OB-I00 (REWILDTEST) grant funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación-AEIWileyDepartamento de EcologíaFacultad de Ciencias20242024-12-23research articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10486/717291https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10769reponame:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAMinstname:Universidad Autónoma de MadridInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/7172912026-06-23T12:46:27Z |
| score |
15,198674 |