Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys
Questions: Two scientific disciplines, vegetation science and weed science, study arable weed vegetation, which has seen a strong diversity decrease in Europe over the last decades. We compared two collections of plot-based vegetation records originating from these two disciplines. The aim was to ch...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/286877 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/286877 https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85127268551 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Weed survey Agriculture Arable weeds Arable Weeds and Management in Europe data collection European Weed Vegetation database Phytosociology Segetal plants Species richness Vegetation survey Vegetation-plot data |
| id |
ES_dfdfec802e4a7b7cbcbc065d4f2bd7a8 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/286877 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys |
| title |
Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys |
| spellingShingle |
Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys Bürger, Jana Weed survey Agriculture Arable weeds Arable Weeds and Management in Europe data collection European Weed Vegetation database Phytosociology Segetal plants Species richness Vegetation survey Vegetation-plot data |
| title_short |
Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys |
| title_full |
Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys |
| title_fullStr |
Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys |
| title_sort |
Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Bürger, Jana Küzmič, Filip Šilc, Urban Jansen, Florian Bergmeier, Erwin Chytrý, Milan Cirujeda, Alicia Fogliatto, Silvia Fried, Guillaume Dostatny, Denise F. Gerowitt, Bärbel Glemnitz, Michael González-Andújar, José Luis Hernández Plaza, María Eva Izquierdo, Jordi Kolářová, Michaela Lososová, Zdeňka Metcalfe, Helen Ņečajeva, Jevgenija Petit, Sandrine Pinke, Gyula Rašomavičius, Valerijus von Redwitz, Christoph Schumacher, Matthias Ulber, Lena Vidotto, Francesco |
| author |
Bürger, Jana |
| author_facet |
Bürger, Jana Küzmič, Filip Šilc, Urban Jansen, Florian Bergmeier, Erwin Chytrý, Milan Cirujeda, Alicia Fogliatto, Silvia Fried, Guillaume Dostatny, Denise F. Gerowitt, Bärbel Glemnitz, Michael González-Andújar, José Luis Hernández Plaza, María Eva Izquierdo, Jordi Kolářová, Michaela Lososová, Zdeňka Metcalfe, Helen Ņečajeva, Jevgenija Petit, Sandrine Pinke, Gyula Rašomavičius, Valerijus von Redwitz, Christoph Schumacher, Matthias Ulber, Lena Vidotto, Francesco |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Küzmič, Filip Šilc, Urban Jansen, Florian Bergmeier, Erwin Chytrý, Milan Cirujeda, Alicia Fogliatto, Silvia Fried, Guillaume Dostatny, Denise F. Gerowitt, Bärbel Glemnitz, Michael González-Andújar, José Luis Hernández Plaza, María Eva Izquierdo, Jordi Kolářová, Michaela Lososová, Zdeňka Metcalfe, Helen Ņečajeva, Jevgenija Petit, Sandrine Pinke, Gyula Rašomavičius, Valerijus von Redwitz, Christoph Schumacher, Matthias Ulber, Lena Vidotto, Francesco |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
German Research Foundation Czech Science Foundation Slovenian Research Agency Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72] |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Weed survey Agriculture Arable weeds Arable Weeds and Management in Europe data collection European Weed Vegetation database Phytosociology Segetal plants Species richness Vegetation survey Vegetation-plot data |
| topic |
Weed survey Agriculture Arable weeds Arable Weeds and Management in Europe data collection European Weed Vegetation database Phytosociology Segetal plants Species richness Vegetation survey Vegetation-plot data |
| description |
Questions: Two scientific disciplines, vegetation science and weed science, study arable weed vegetation, which has seen a strong diversity decrease in Europe over the last decades. We compared two collections of plot-based vegetation records originating from these two disciplines. The aim was to check the suitability of the collections for joint analysis and for addressing research questions from the opposing domains. We asked: are these collections complementary? If so, how can they be used for joint analysis?. Location: Europe. Methods: We compared 13 311 phytosociological relevés and 13 328 records from weed science, concerning both data collection properties and the recorded species richness. To deal with bias in the data, we also analysed different subsets (i.e., crops, geographical regions, organic vs conventional fields, center vs edge plots). Results: Records from vegetation science have an average species number of 19.0 ± 10.4. Metadata on survey methodology or agronomic practices are rare in this collection. Records from weed science have an average species number of 8.5 ± 6.4. They are accompanied by extensive methodological information. Vegetation science records and the weed science records taken at field edges or from organic fields have similar species numbers. The collections cover different parts of Europe but the results are consistent in six geographical subsets and the overall data set. The difference in species numbers may be caused by differences in methodology between the disciplines, i.e., plot positioning within fields, plot sizes, or survey timing. Conclusion: This comparison of arable weed data that were originally sampled with a different purpose represents a new effort in connecting research between vegetation scientists and weed scientists. Both collections show different aspects of weed vegetation, which means the joint use of the data is valuable as it can contribute to a more complete picture of weed species diversity in European arable landscapes. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022 2023 2023 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Publisher's version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/286877 https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85127268551 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/286877 https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85127268551 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Bürger, Jana; Küzmič, Filip; Šilc, Urban; Jansen, Florian; Bergmeier, Erwin; Chytrý, Milan; Cirujeda, Alicia; Fogliatto, Silvia; Fried, Guillaume; Dostatny, Denise F.; Gerowitt, Bärbel; Glemnitz, Michael; González-Andújar, José Luis; Hernández Plaza, María Eva; Izquierdo, Jordi; Kolářová, Michaela; Lososová, Zdeňka; Metcalfe, Helen; Ņečajeva, Jevgenija; Petit, Sandrine; Pinke, Gyula; Rašomavičius, Valerijus; von Redwitz, Christoph; Schumacher, Matthias; Ulber, Lena; Vidotto, Francesco; 2022; Supporting information to the paper Bürger, J. et al. Two sides of one medal: arable weed vegetation of Europe in agronomical weed surveys compared to phytosociological data. Applied Vegetation Science [Dataset]; John Wiley & Sons; https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12460 https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12460 Sí |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Wiley & Sons |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Wiley & Sons |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| reponame_str |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| collection |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869422103753654272 |
| spelling |
Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveysBürger, JanaKüzmič, FilipŠilc, UrbanJansen, FlorianBergmeier, ErwinChytrý, MilanCirujeda, AliciaFogliatto, SilviaFried, GuillaumeDostatny, Denise F.Gerowitt, BärbelGlemnitz, MichaelGonzález-Andújar, José LuisHernández Plaza, María EvaIzquierdo, JordiKolářová, MichaelaLososová, ZdeňkaMetcalfe, HelenŅečajeva, JevgenijaPetit, SandrinePinke, GyulaRašomavičius, Valerijusvon Redwitz, ChristophSchumacher, MatthiasUlber, LenaVidotto, FrancescoWeed surveyAgricultureArable weedsArable Weeds and Management in Europe data collectionEuropean Weed Vegetation databasePhytosociologySegetal plantsSpecies richnessVegetation surveyVegetation-plot dataQuestions: Two scientific disciplines, vegetation science and weed science, study arable weed vegetation, which has seen a strong diversity decrease in Europe over the last decades. We compared two collections of plot-based vegetation records originating from these two disciplines. The aim was to check the suitability of the collections for joint analysis and for addressing research questions from the opposing domains. We asked: are these collections complementary? If so, how can they be used for joint analysis?. Location: Europe. Methods: We compared 13 311 phytosociological relevés and 13 328 records from weed science, concerning both data collection properties and the recorded species richness. To deal with bias in the data, we also analysed different subsets (i.e., crops, geographical regions, organic vs conventional fields, center vs edge plots). Results: Records from vegetation science have an average species number of 19.0 ± 10.4. Metadata on survey methodology or agronomic practices are rare in this collection. Records from weed science have an average species number of 8.5 ± 6.4. They are accompanied by extensive methodological information. Vegetation science records and the weed science records taken at field edges or from organic fields have similar species numbers. The collections cover different parts of Europe but the results are consistent in six geographical subsets and the overall data set. The difference in species numbers may be caused by differences in methodology between the disciplines, i.e., plot positioning within fields, plot sizes, or survey timing. Conclusion: This comparison of arable weed data that were originally sampled with a different purpose represents a new effort in connecting research between vegetation scientists and weed scientists. Both collections show different aspects of weed vegetation, which means the joint use of the data is valuable as it can contribute to a more complete picture of weed species diversity in European arable landscapes.The work on this project was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (grant number BU 3097/1-1 for Jana Bürger), Czech Science Foundation (grant number 19-28491X for Milan Chytrý and Zdeňka Lososová), and by Slovenian Research Agency (research core funding No. P1-0236 for Urban Šilc and Young researcher programme for Filip Küzmič).Peer reviewedJohn Wiley & SonsGerman Research FoundationCzech Science FoundationSlovenian Research AgencyConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]202320232022info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/286877https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85127268551reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)InglésBürger, Jana; Küzmič, Filip; Šilc, Urban; Jansen, Florian; Bergmeier, Erwin; Chytrý, Milan; Cirujeda, Alicia; Fogliatto, Silvia; Fried, Guillaume; Dostatny, Denise F.; Gerowitt, Bärbel; Glemnitz, Michael; González-Andújar, José Luis; Hernández Plaza, María Eva; Izquierdo, Jordi; Kolářová, Michaela; Lososová, Zdeňka; Metcalfe, Helen; Ņečajeva, Jevgenija; Petit, Sandrine; Pinke, Gyula; Rašomavičius, Valerijus; von Redwitz, Christoph; Schumacher, Matthias; Ulber, Lena; Vidotto, Francesco; 2022; Supporting information to the paper Bürger, J. et al. Two sides of one medal: arable weed vegetation of Europe in agronomical weed surveys compared to phytosociological data. Applied Vegetation Science [Dataset]; John Wiley & Sons; https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12460https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12460Síinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/2868772026-05-22T06:33:51Z |
| score |
15,812455 |