Hacia una mejor enseñanza de la formulación de preguntas: lecciones de la IA en casos de malentendidos comunicativos
[EN] The case study has been used in linguistic education as a tool to foster a reflective and critical analysis of misunderstandings that occur in everyday situations; however, the question formulation phase has hardly been researched. The aim of this paper is to explore how artificial intelligence...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repositorio: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/207982 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/207982 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Critical thinking Linguistic teaching Questioning Inteligencia artificial Pensamiento crítico Enseñanza lingüística Formulación de preguntas |
| Sumario: | [EN] The case study has been used in linguistic education as a tool to foster a reflective and critical analysis of misunderstandings that occur in everyday situations; however, the question formulation phase has hardly been researched. The aim of this paper is to explore how artificial intelligence (AI) can support the teaching of question formulation for cases of communicative misunderstanding. A comparative analysis is conducted of questions formulated by students and by ChatGPT in twenty-four cases of misunderstandings of the four linguistic-pragmatic levels. A mixed methodology is used to quantify the data and analyze patterns in the questions formulated by students and ChatGPT. The results show that the AI tool asks questions at a higher cognitive level, according to Bloom's taxonomy. Among the conclusions, this study shows that the ChatGPT language model tool can be used to improve teaching questioning. Thus, the findings can be valuable to develop teaching strategies that qualify students' reasoning, instead of seeing this human intellectual capacity run over by the power of the machine in the educational environment. |
|---|