Effects of resistance training on physical performance in high-level 800-meter athletes: a comparison between high-speed resistance training and circuit training

This study compared the effects of two resistance training programs during 25 weeks on physical performance and hormonal response in high-level 800 m athletes. Thirteen male athletes (800 m personal best: 1:43-1:58 min:ss) were divided into 2 groups: highspeed resistance training group (RTG) (n = 6)...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Bachero Mena, Beatriz, Pareja Blanco, Fernando, González Badillo, Juan José
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
Repositorio:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
OAI Identifier:oai:idus.us.es:11441/166674
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/11441/166674
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003066
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Middle-distance Running
Countermovement Jump
Squat
Hormones
Concurrent Training
id ES_cc37df191ac75cc61943fefe7df00e20
oai_identifier_str oai:idus.us.es:11441/166674
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Effects of resistance training on physical performance in high-level 800-meter athletes: a comparison between high-speed resistance training and circuit trainingBachero Mena, BeatrizPareja Blanco, FernandoGonzález Badillo, Juan JoséMiddle-distance RunningCountermovement JumpSquatHormonesConcurrent TrainingThis study compared the effects of two resistance training programs during 25 weeks on physical performance and hormonal response in high-level 800 m athletes. Thirteen male athletes (800 m personal best: 1:43-1:58 min:ss) were divided into 2 groups: highspeed resistance training group (RTG) (n = 6) and circuit training group (CTG) (n = 7). Three tests (T1, T2 and T3) including sprint and 800 m running, strength exercises and blood hormones samples were carried out. Both groups showed improvements in 800 m performance (RTG: likely positive, 80/20/0%; CTG: very likely positive, 98/2/0%), however, RTG showed an additional improvement in 200 m (likely positive, 85/15/0%), countermovement jump (very likely positive, 98/2/0%), and squat (likely positive, 91/9/0%), whereas CTG reached likely positive (88/11/1%) effects in CMJ and unclear/possibly negative effects in the rest of the strength variables analyzed. Concerning hormones, RTG resulted in a likely increase (83/15/3%) in testosterone from T1 to T3, and CTG showed a likely increase (79/17/4%) in cortisol from T2 to T3, remaining the rest of the hormones analyzed unclear. These results suggest that a resistance training characterized by high-speed and low-volume produced better improvements in both strength and running performance than a circuit training, accompanied by little changes in the hormonal response. Middle-distance Running, Countermovement Jump, Squat, Hormones,Lippncott Williams & WilkinsMotricidad Humana y Rendimiento Deportivo2021info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/166674https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003066reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevillainstname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)InglésJournal of Estrenght and conditioning research, 35 (7), 1905-1925.https://dx.doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003066info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:idus.us.es:11441/1666742026-06-17T12:51:07Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of resistance training on physical performance in high-level 800-meter athletes: a comparison between high-speed resistance training and circuit training
title Effects of resistance training on physical performance in high-level 800-meter athletes: a comparison between high-speed resistance training and circuit training
spellingShingle Effects of resistance training on physical performance in high-level 800-meter athletes: a comparison between high-speed resistance training and circuit training
Bachero Mena, Beatriz
Middle-distance Running
Countermovement Jump
Squat
Hormones
Concurrent Training
title_short Effects of resistance training on physical performance in high-level 800-meter athletes: a comparison between high-speed resistance training and circuit training
title_full Effects of resistance training on physical performance in high-level 800-meter athletes: a comparison between high-speed resistance training and circuit training
title_fullStr Effects of resistance training on physical performance in high-level 800-meter athletes: a comparison between high-speed resistance training and circuit training
title_full_unstemmed Effects of resistance training on physical performance in high-level 800-meter athletes: a comparison between high-speed resistance training and circuit training
title_sort Effects of resistance training on physical performance in high-level 800-meter athletes: a comparison between high-speed resistance training and circuit training
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bachero Mena, Beatriz
Pareja Blanco, Fernando
González Badillo, Juan José
author Bachero Mena, Beatriz
author_facet Bachero Mena, Beatriz
Pareja Blanco, Fernando
González Badillo, Juan José
author_role author
author2 Pareja Blanco, Fernando
González Badillo, Juan José
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Motricidad Humana y Rendimiento Deportivo
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Middle-distance Running
Countermovement Jump
Squat
Hormones
Concurrent Training
topic Middle-distance Running
Countermovement Jump
Squat
Hormones
Concurrent Training
description This study compared the effects of two resistance training programs during 25 weeks on physical performance and hormonal response in high-level 800 m athletes. Thirteen male athletes (800 m personal best: 1:43-1:58 min:ss) were divided into 2 groups: highspeed resistance training group (RTG) (n = 6) and circuit training group (CTG) (n = 7). Three tests (T1, T2 and T3) including sprint and 800 m running, strength exercises and blood hormones samples were carried out. Both groups showed improvements in 800 m performance (RTG: likely positive, 80/20/0%; CTG: very likely positive, 98/2/0%), however, RTG showed an additional improvement in 200 m (likely positive, 85/15/0%), countermovement jump (very likely positive, 98/2/0%), and squat (likely positive, 91/9/0%), whereas CTG reached likely positive (88/11/1%) effects in CMJ and unclear/possibly negative effects in the rest of the strength variables analyzed. Concerning hormones, RTG resulted in a likely increase (83/15/3%) in testosterone from T1 to T3, and CTG showed a likely increase (79/17/4%) in cortisol from T2 to T3, remaining the rest of the hormones analyzed unclear. These results suggest that a resistance training characterized by high-speed and low-volume produced better improvements in both strength and running performance than a circuit training, accompanied by little changes in the hormonal response. Middle-distance Running, Countermovement Jump, Squat, Hormones,
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11441/166674
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003066
url https://hdl.handle.net/11441/166674
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003066
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Estrenght and conditioning research, 35 (7), 1905-1925.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003066
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lippncott Williams & Wilkins
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lippncott Williams & Wilkins
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
instname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
instname_str Universidad de Sevilla (US)
reponame_str idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
collection idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869419678758076416
score 15.228081

Registos relacionados