Beyond crippling bias: Carcass-location bias in roadkill studies

Wildlife roadkill studies need to cope with a mismatch among recorded carcasses and actual road mortality, because of the existence of three biases: crippling, carcass-persistence, and observer bias. Here, we focused on the often overlooked crippling bias, suggesting that it should be called carcass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Román, Jacinto, Rodríguez, Carlos, García-Rodríguez, Alberto, Diez-Virto, Irati, Gutiérrez-Expósito, Carlos, Jubete, Fernando, Paniw, María, Jiménez-Clavero, Miguel Ángel, Revilla, Eloy, D'Amico, Marcello
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2024
Country:España
Institution:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repository:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/386072
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/386072
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85187477285
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Carcass detectability
Carcass persistence
Crippling loss
Observer bias
Rebounding bias
Retention bias
Road ecology
Road mortality
Searcher efficiency
Wildlife–vehicle collisions
Description
Summary:Wildlife roadkill studies need to cope with a mismatch among recorded carcasses and actual road mortality, because of the existence of three biases: crippling, carcass-persistence, and observer bias. Here, we focused on the often overlooked crippling bias, suggesting that it should be called carcass-location bias and disentangling the related three possible outcomes for affected wildlife: injured animal escaping and dying away from road, animal rebounding off the road after vehicle collision, and animal retained by vehicle. Such outcomes can probably be affected by different species traits, and, in order to make a first evaluation of this hypothesis, we opportunistically collected 150 direct observations on the ultimate fate of roadkilled vertebrates. Approximately one third of them were affected by carcass-location bias, so extremely difficult to be recorded through typical roadkill surveys, entailing a considerable and overlooked source of error for roadkill studies and mitigation actions based on them.