Enhancing diagnostic accuracy: Direct immunofluorescence assay as the gold standard for detecting Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in canine and feline fecal samples

The enteric protozoan parasites Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. are common cause of diarrhea in pet dogs and cats, affecting primarily young animals. This comparative study evaluates the diagnostic performance of conventional and molecular methods for the detection of G. duodenalis and C...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Barrera, Juan P, Miró, Guadalupe, Carmena, David, Foncubierta, Carlos, Sarquis, Juliana, Marino, Valentina, Estévez-Sánchez, Efrén, Bailo-Barroso, Begoña, Checa, Rocío, Montoya, Ana
Tipo de documento: artigo
Data de publicação:2024
País:España
Recursos:Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII)
Repositório:Repisalud
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:repisalud.isciii.es:20.500.12105/26433
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/26433
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Cat
DFA
Diagnostic performance
Dog
ICT
MIF
PCR
Risk factors
Animals
Cat Diseases
Cats
Cryptosporidiosis
Cryptosporidium
Dog Diseases
Dogs
Feces
Female
Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct
Giardia lamblia
Giardiasis
Male
Prevalence
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Sensitivity and Specificity
Descrição
Resumo:The enteric protozoan parasites Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. are common cause of diarrhea in pet dogs and cats, affecting primarily young animals. This comparative study evaluates the diagnostic performance of conventional and molecular methods for the detection of G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. infection in dogs and cats.The compared diagnostic assays included merthiolate-iodine-formalin (MIF) method, lateral flow immunochromatography rapid test (ICT) and real-time PCR; using direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) as golden standard. The study included the analysis of 328 fecal samples from different dog (n = 225) and cat (n = 103) populations.According to DFA, the overall prevalence of G. duodenalis was 24.4% (80/328, 95% CI: 19.8-29.4), varying from 11.6% (12/103, 95% CI: 6.2-19.5) in cats to 30.2% (68/225, 95% CI: 24.3-36.7) in dogs. The overall prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. was 4.0% (13/328, 95% CI: 2.1-6.7), varying from 2.9% (3/103, 95% CI: 0.6-8.3) in cats to 4.4% (10/225, 95% CI: 2.1-8.0) in dogs. MIF was only used for the detection of G. duodenalis, which was identified by this method in 22.7% of dogs and 7.8% of cats, respectively. DFA was the most sensitive technique for detecting G. duodenalis in samples from dogs and cats (p-value: < 0.001), followed by real-time PCR. Identification of Cryptosporidium infections was most effectively accomplished by the combination of DFA and PCR technique (p-value: < 0.001). In addition, epidemiological (sex, age, origin) and clinical (fecal consistency) variables were collected to assess their potential associations with an increased likelihood of infection by G. duodenalis and/or Cryptosporidium spp. Breeder dogs were more likely to harbor G. duodenalis infection (p-value: 0.004), whereas female cats were significantly more infected with Cryptosporidium (p-value: 0.003). In conclusion, DFA (alone or in combination with PCR) has been identified as the most accurate and cost-effective method for detecting G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in fecal samples from pet dogs and cats. This highlights their importance in both veterinary and clinical settings for enabling prompt treatment and preventing potential transmission to humans.