Hybrid resource provisioning for cloud workflows with malleable and rigid tasks
[EN] In cloud computing, reserved and on-demand instances are generally provided by service providers. Hybridization of the two alternatives can considerably save costs when renting resources from the cloud. However, it is a big challenge to determine the appropriate amount of reserved and on-demand...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Data de publicação: | 2021 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repositório: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/186046 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/186046 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Workflow scheduling Cloud computing Hybrid resource provisioning Malleable task ESTADISTICA E INVESTIGACION OPERATIVA |
| Resumo: | [EN] In cloud computing, reserved and on-demand instances are generally provided by service providers. Hybridization of the two alternatives can considerably save costs when renting resources from the cloud. However, it is a big challenge to determine the appropriate amount of reserved and on-demand resources in terms of users' requirements. In this paper, the workflow scheduling problem with both reserved and on-demand instances is considered. The objective is to minimize the total rental cost under deadline constrains. The considered problem is mathematically modeled. A multiple sequence-based earliest finish time method is proposed to construct schedules for the workflows. Four different rules are used to generate initial task allocation sequences. Types and quantities of resources are determined by a free time block-based schedule construction mechanism. New sequences are generated by a variable neighborhood search method. Experimental and statistical analyses and results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm algorithm generates considerable cost savings when compared to the algorithms with only on-demand or reserved instances. |
|---|