Participation in administrative procedures: lesson from the Spanish experience
This papers examines the legislative regulation of administrative procedures in Spain and Italy. It focuses on citizens’ intervention in administrative procedures. Although the Italian and Spanish administrative systems have several common features, due to the influence of the French model of admini...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2010 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositório: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10230/43140 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10230/43140 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Procediment administratiu -- Espanya Procediment administratiu -- Itàlia Dret administratiu -- Espanya Dret administratiu -- Itàlia |
| id |
ES_ac4c6bbd249155e9fdb6060614b3f4bc |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:recercat.cat:10230/43140 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Participation in administrative procedures: lesson from the Spanish experienceMir Puigpelat, OriolProcediment administratiu -- EspanyaProcediment administratiu -- ItàliaDret administratiu -- EspanyaDret administratiu -- ItàliaThis papers examines the legislative regulation of administrative procedures in Spain and Italy. It focuses on citizens’ intervention in administrative procedures. Although the Italian and Spanish administrative systems have several common features, due to the influence of the French model of administration, they differ with regard to both the right to be heard in individual procedures and participation in rulemaking procedures. From the first point of view, the Spanish legislation is not only less recent, but it also makes different choices, to the extent to that it protects less the interests of those who are not formally involved by the procedure, but provides a specific instrument, the “información pública”. The main difference, however, regards rulemaking procedures. Unlike in Italy, these procedures are characterized by participatory tools, as a consequence of a political choice made by the Constitution and confirmed by both legislation and institutional practice. This does not imply, however, that participation in administrative procedures is always connected with the democratic principle. Rather, it is ofter connected with the Rule of law, though a clearcut distinction may not be drawn easily.Italian Journal of Public Law Association201920192010info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/43140reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésItalian Journal of Public Law. 2010;2(2):329-38.© Italian Journal of Public Law Associationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:10230/431402026-05-29T05:05:01Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Participation in administrative procedures: lesson from the Spanish experience |
| title |
Participation in administrative procedures: lesson from the Spanish experience |
| spellingShingle |
Participation in administrative procedures: lesson from the Spanish experience Mir Puigpelat, Oriol Procediment administratiu -- Espanya Procediment administratiu -- Itàlia Dret administratiu -- Espanya Dret administratiu -- Itàlia |
| title_short |
Participation in administrative procedures: lesson from the Spanish experience |
| title_full |
Participation in administrative procedures: lesson from the Spanish experience |
| title_fullStr |
Participation in administrative procedures: lesson from the Spanish experience |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Participation in administrative procedures: lesson from the Spanish experience |
| title_sort |
Participation in administrative procedures: lesson from the Spanish experience |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Mir Puigpelat, Oriol |
| author |
Mir Puigpelat, Oriol |
| author_facet |
Mir Puigpelat, Oriol |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Procediment administratiu -- Espanya Procediment administratiu -- Itàlia Dret administratiu -- Espanya Dret administratiu -- Itàlia |
| topic |
Procediment administratiu -- Espanya Procediment administratiu -- Itàlia Dret administratiu -- Espanya Dret administratiu -- Itàlia |
| description |
This papers examines the legislative regulation of administrative procedures in Spain and Italy. It focuses on citizens’ intervention in administrative procedures. Although the Italian and Spanish administrative systems have several common features, due to the influence of the French model of administration, they differ with regard to both the right to be heard in individual procedures and participation in rulemaking procedures. From the first point of view, the Spanish legislation is not only less recent, but it also makes different choices, to the extent to that it protects less the interests of those who are not formally involved by the procedure, but provides a specific instrument, the “información pública”. The main difference, however, regards rulemaking procedures. Unlike in Italy, these procedures are characterized by participatory tools, as a consequence of a political choice made by the Constitution and confirmed by both legislation and institutional practice. This does not imply, however, that participation in administrative procedures is always connected with the democratic principle. Rather, it is ofter connected with the Rule of law, though a clearcut distinction may not be drawn easily. |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010 2019 2019 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/43140 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/43140 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Italian Journal of Public Law. 2010;2(2):329-38. |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
© Italian Journal of Public Law Association info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
© Italian Journal of Public Law Association |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Italian Journal of Public Law Association |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Italian Journal of Public Law Association |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| instname_str |
Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| reponame_str |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| collection |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869416343622647808 |
| score |
15,812455 |