“A Worker is a Worker is a Worker” Collective Bargaining and Platform Work, the Case of Deliveroo Couriers

The focus of this commentary is the compatibility of Section 296(1)(b) of the 1992 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A) with Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), insofar as it excludes workers who do not provide their service personally from b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Aloisi, Antonio
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Institución:IE
Repositorio:Repositorio IE
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ie.edu:20.500.14417/3331
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4639960
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/3331
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Gig-economy
UK labour law
Collective rights
56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho
ODS 8 - Trabajo decente y crecimiento económico
id ES_ab36fa643a2dee73155b9fa389cb6a8c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ie.edu:20.500.14417/3331
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling “A Worker is a Worker is a Worker” Collective Bargaining and Platform Work, the Case of Deliveroo CouriersAloisi, AntonioGig-economyUK labour lawCollective rights56 Ciencias Jurídicas y DerechoODS 8 - Trabajo decente y crecimiento económicoThe focus of this commentary is the compatibility of Section 296(1)(b) of the 1992 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A) with Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), insofar as it excludes workers who do not provide their service personally from being represented by a union on the negotiation of pay and terms and conditions of work. The case shows how the domestic term worker may be equivocal and its interpretation seems at odds with various international standards, including the ILO’s instruments. This confusion raises the question of whether steps should be taken to “bring domestic law into alignment [with European law] in the interests of legal certainty.”yesPublishedSSRNhttps://ror.org/02jjdwm75202420242019info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4639960https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/3331reponame:Repositorio IEinstname:IEInglésIE Law SchoolIE UniversityDigital & Tech LawAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositorio.ie.edu:20.500.14417/33312026-06-15T12:40:57Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “A Worker is a Worker is a Worker” Collective Bargaining and Platform Work, the Case of Deliveroo Couriers
title “A Worker is a Worker is a Worker” Collective Bargaining and Platform Work, the Case of Deliveroo Couriers
spellingShingle “A Worker is a Worker is a Worker” Collective Bargaining and Platform Work, the Case of Deliveroo Couriers
Aloisi, Antonio
Gig-economy
UK labour law
Collective rights
56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho
ODS 8 - Trabajo decente y crecimiento económico
title_short “A Worker is a Worker is a Worker” Collective Bargaining and Platform Work, the Case of Deliveroo Couriers
title_full “A Worker is a Worker is a Worker” Collective Bargaining and Platform Work, the Case of Deliveroo Couriers
title_fullStr “A Worker is a Worker is a Worker” Collective Bargaining and Platform Work, the Case of Deliveroo Couriers
title_full_unstemmed “A Worker is a Worker is a Worker” Collective Bargaining and Platform Work, the Case of Deliveroo Couriers
title_sort “A Worker is a Worker is a Worker” Collective Bargaining and Platform Work, the Case of Deliveroo Couriers
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Aloisi, Antonio
author Aloisi, Antonio
author_facet Aloisi, Antonio
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv https://ror.org/02jjdwm75
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Gig-economy
UK labour law
Collective rights
56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho
ODS 8 - Trabajo decente y crecimiento económico
topic Gig-economy
UK labour law
Collective rights
56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho
ODS 8 - Trabajo decente y crecimiento económico
description The focus of this commentary is the compatibility of Section 296(1)(b) of the 1992 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULR(C)A) with Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), insofar as it excludes workers who do not provide their service personally from being represented by a union on the negotiation of pay and terms and conditions of work. The case shows how the domestic term worker may be equivocal and its interpretation seems at odds with various international standards, including the ILO’s instruments. This confusion raises the question of whether steps should be taken to “bring domestic law into alignment [with European law] in the interests of legal certainty.”
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4639960
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/3331
url https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4639960
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/3331
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv IE Law School
IE University
Digital & Tech Law
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SSRN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SSRN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio IE
instname:IE
instname_str IE
reponame_str Repositorio IE
collection Repositorio IE
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869416249775095808
score 15,812455