Mentoring and Research Self-Efficacy of Doctoral Students: A Psychometric Approach

Effective mentoring is an integral component of the doctoral dissertation process. This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of two questionnaires developed to assess research self-efficacy and the mentoring/supervision process. The sample comprised 1265 doctorate students (mean age...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Amador, Juan Antonio, Peró, Maribel, Feliu, Maria, 1980-, Pérez González, Alba, Cañete-Massé, Cristina, Jarne Esparcia, Adolfo, Triadó i Ivern, Xavier Ma., Guàrdia-Olmos, Joan, 1958-
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de la UB
OAI Identifier:oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/212824
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/212824
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Eficàcia de l'ensenyament
Autoavaluació
Doctorands
Psicometria
Tutoria (Ensenyament)
Effective teaching
Self-evaluation
Doctoral students
Psychometrics
Tutoring (Teaching)
id ES_a068c2ca2a5eadea08b8c4d6b283562c
oai_identifier_str oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/212824
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Mentoring and Research Self-Efficacy of Doctoral Students: A Psychometric ApproachAmador, Juan AntonioPeró, MaribelFeliu, Maria, 1980-Pérez González, AlbaCañete-Massé, CristinaJarne Esparcia, AdolfoTriadó i Ivern, Xavier Ma.Guàrdia-Olmos, Joan, 1958-Eficàcia de l'ensenyamentAutoavaluacióDoctorandsPsicometriaTutoria (Ensenyament)Effective teachingSelf-evaluationDoctoral studentsPsychometricsTutoring (Teaching)Effective mentoring is an integral component of the doctoral dissertation process. This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of two questionnaires developed to assess research self-efficacy and the mentoring/supervision process. The sample comprised 1265 doctorate students (mean age = 32.36 years; standard deviation = 8.20). Items in both questionnaires had adequate discrimination indexes and principal component analysis supported the unifactorial structure of each questionnaire, with adequate percentages of explained variance (47.5% and 60%, respectively). Reliability was good or excellent: = 0.71 and = 0.94. In the research self efficacy questionnaire, there was a significant interaction between gender and year of doctoral studies. Men had higher scores in the first, second and third years of their doctoral studies than women, but this ranking was reversed for the fourth and fifth years. In the mentoring/supervision questionnaire, PhD students in their first year had a higher score than those in the third, fourth and fifth years, and students in the second year had a higher score than those in the fifth year. Understanding students' perception of their research self-efficacy and the mentoring process is of great importance given the relationship between the mentoring process and students' academic performance and personal well-being.2023info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/212824Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Clínica i Psicobiologia)reponame:Dipòsit Digital de la UBinstname:Universidad de BarcelonaInglésReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040358Education Sciences, 2023, vol. 13, num.4, 358https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040358cc-by (c) Amador-Campos, J. A. et al., 2023http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/2128242026-05-27T06:46:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mentoring and Research Self-Efficacy of Doctoral Students: A Psychometric Approach
title Mentoring and Research Self-Efficacy of Doctoral Students: A Psychometric Approach
spellingShingle Mentoring and Research Self-Efficacy of Doctoral Students: A Psychometric Approach
Amador, Juan Antonio
Eficàcia de l'ensenyament
Autoavaluació
Doctorands
Psicometria
Tutoria (Ensenyament)
Effective teaching
Self-evaluation
Doctoral students
Psychometrics
Tutoring (Teaching)
title_short Mentoring and Research Self-Efficacy of Doctoral Students: A Psychometric Approach
title_full Mentoring and Research Self-Efficacy of Doctoral Students: A Psychometric Approach
title_fullStr Mentoring and Research Self-Efficacy of Doctoral Students: A Psychometric Approach
title_full_unstemmed Mentoring and Research Self-Efficacy of Doctoral Students: A Psychometric Approach
title_sort Mentoring and Research Self-Efficacy of Doctoral Students: A Psychometric Approach
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Amador, Juan Antonio
Peró, Maribel
Feliu, Maria, 1980-
Pérez González, Alba
Cañete-Massé, Cristina
Jarne Esparcia, Adolfo
Triadó i Ivern, Xavier Ma.
Guàrdia-Olmos, Joan, 1958-
author Amador, Juan Antonio
author_facet Amador, Juan Antonio
Peró, Maribel
Feliu, Maria, 1980-
Pérez González, Alba
Cañete-Massé, Cristina
Jarne Esparcia, Adolfo
Triadó i Ivern, Xavier Ma.
Guàrdia-Olmos, Joan, 1958-
author_role author
author2 Peró, Maribel
Feliu, Maria, 1980-
Pérez González, Alba
Cañete-Massé, Cristina
Jarne Esparcia, Adolfo
Triadó i Ivern, Xavier Ma.
Guàrdia-Olmos, Joan, 1958-
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Eficàcia de l'ensenyament
Autoavaluació
Doctorands
Psicometria
Tutoria (Ensenyament)
Effective teaching
Self-evaluation
Doctoral students
Psychometrics
Tutoring (Teaching)
topic Eficàcia de l'ensenyament
Autoavaluació
Doctorands
Psicometria
Tutoria (Ensenyament)
Effective teaching
Self-evaluation
Doctoral students
Psychometrics
Tutoring (Teaching)
description Effective mentoring is an integral component of the doctoral dissertation process. This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of two questionnaires developed to assess research self-efficacy and the mentoring/supervision process. The sample comprised 1265 doctorate students (mean age = 32.36 years; standard deviation = 8.20). Items in both questionnaires had adequate discrimination indexes and principal component analysis supported the unifactorial structure of each questionnaire, with adequate percentages of explained variance (47.5% and 60%, respectively). Reliability was good or excellent: = 0.71 and = 0.94. In the research self efficacy questionnaire, there was a significant interaction between gender and year of doctoral studies. Men had higher scores in the first, second and third years of their doctoral studies than women, but this ranking was reversed for the fourth and fifth years. In the mentoring/supervision questionnaire, PhD students in their first year had a higher score than those in the third, fourth and fifth years, and students in the second year had a higher score than those in the fifth year. Understanding students' perception of their research self-efficacy and the mentoring process is of great importance given the relationship between the mentoring process and students' academic performance and personal well-being.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/2445/212824
url https://hdl.handle.net/2445/212824
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040358
Education Sciences, 2023, vol. 13, num.4, 358
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040358
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv cc-by (c) Amador-Campos, J. A. et al., 2023
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv cc-by (c) Amador-Campos, J. A. et al., 2023
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Clínica i Psicobiologia)
reponame:Dipòsit Digital de la UB
instname:Universidad de Barcelona
instname_str Universidad de Barcelona
reponame_str Dipòsit Digital de la UB
collection Dipòsit Digital de la UB
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869415008965754880
score 15.812455