Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction
Objective Detection of fetal growth restriction (FGR) remains poor and most screening strategies rely on cross-sectional evaluation of fetal size during the third trimester. A longitudinal and individualized approach has been proposed as an alternative method of evaluation. The aim of this study was...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2018 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Fundació Sant Joan de Déu |
| Repositório: | r-FSJD. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de la Fundació Sant Joan de Déu |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:fsjd.fundanetsuite.com:p11056 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://fsjd.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=11056 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | fetal growth fetal growth restriction longitudinal growth small-for-gestational age ultrasound |
| id |
ES_9feffd86d6010226a849bb12d0cb1742 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:fsjd.fundanetsuite.com:p11056 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restrictionCaradeux JEixarch EMazarico EBasuki TRGratacos EFigueras Ffetal growthfetal growth restrictionlongitudinal growthsmall-for-gestational ageultrasoundObjective Detection of fetal growth restriction (FGR) remains poor and most screening strategies rely on cross-sectional evaluation of fetal size during the third trimester. A longitudinal and individualized approach has been proposed as an alternative method of evaluation. The aim of this study was to compare second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment to cross-sectional evaluation in the third trimester for the prediction of small-for-gestational age (SGA) and late FGR in low-risk singleton pregnancy. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of 2696 unselected consecutive low-risk singleton pregnancies scanned at 21 +/- 2 and 32 +/- 2 weeks. For cross-sectional growth assessment, abdominal circumference (AC) measurements were transformed to z-values according the 21st-INTERGROWTH standards. Longitudinal growth assessment was performed by calculating the AC z-velocity and the second-to third-trimester AC conditional growth centile. Longitudinal assessment was compared with cross-sectional assessment at 32 weeks. Association of cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluations with SGA and late FGR was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Predictive performance was determined by receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis. Result In total, 210 (7.8%) newborns were classified as SGA and 103 (3.8%) as late FGR. Neither longitudinal measurement improved the association with SGA or late FGR provided by cross-sectional evaluation of AC z-score at 32 weeks. Areas under the curves of AC z-velocity and conditional AC growth were significantly smaller than those of cross-sectional AC z-scores (P < 0.001), although AC z-velocity performed significantly better than did conditional AC growth (P < 0.001). Conclusion Longitudinal assessment of fetal growth from the second to third trimester has a low predictive capacity for SGA and late FGR in low-risk singleton pregnancy compared with cross-sectional growth evaluation. Copyright (C) 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.WILEY2018info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://fsjd.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=11056ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGYISSN: 09607692ISSNe: 14690705reponame:r-FSJD. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de la Fundació Sant Joan de Déuinstname:Fundació Sant Joan de DéuInglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:fsjd.fundanetsuite.com:p110562026-05-27T12:37:41Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction |
| title |
Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction |
| spellingShingle |
Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction Caradeux J fetal growth fetal growth restriction longitudinal growth small-for-gestational age ultrasound |
| title_short |
Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction |
| title_full |
Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction |
| title_fullStr |
Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction |
| title_sort |
Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Caradeux J Eixarch E Mazarico E Basuki TR Gratacos E Figueras F |
| author |
Caradeux J |
| author_facet |
Caradeux J Eixarch E Mazarico E Basuki TR Gratacos E Figueras F |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Eixarch E Mazarico E Basuki TR Gratacos E Figueras F |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
fetal growth fetal growth restriction longitudinal growth small-for-gestational age ultrasound |
| topic |
fetal growth fetal growth restriction longitudinal growth small-for-gestational age ultrasound |
| description |
Objective Detection of fetal growth restriction (FGR) remains poor and most screening strategies rely on cross-sectional evaluation of fetal size during the third trimester. A longitudinal and individualized approach has been proposed as an alternative method of evaluation. The aim of this study was to compare second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment to cross-sectional evaluation in the third trimester for the prediction of small-for-gestational age (SGA) and late FGR in low-risk singleton pregnancy. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of 2696 unselected consecutive low-risk singleton pregnancies scanned at 21 +/- 2 and 32 +/- 2 weeks. For cross-sectional growth assessment, abdominal circumference (AC) measurements were transformed to z-values according the 21st-INTERGROWTH standards. Longitudinal growth assessment was performed by calculating the AC z-velocity and the second-to third-trimester AC conditional growth centile. Longitudinal assessment was compared with cross-sectional assessment at 32 weeks. Association of cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluations with SGA and late FGR was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Predictive performance was determined by receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis. Result In total, 210 (7.8%) newborns were classified as SGA and 103 (3.8%) as late FGR. Neither longitudinal measurement improved the association with SGA or late FGR provided by cross-sectional evaluation of AC z-score at 32 weeks. Areas under the curves of AC z-velocity and conditional AC growth were significantly smaller than those of cross-sectional AC z-scores (P < 0.001), although AC z-velocity performed significantly better than did conditional AC growth (P < 0.001). Conclusion Longitudinal assessment of fetal growth from the second to third trimester has a low predictive capacity for SGA and late FGR in low-risk singleton pregnancy compared with cross-sectional growth evaluation. Copyright (C) 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://fsjd.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=11056 |
| url |
https://fsjd.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=11056 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
WILEY |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
WILEY |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY ISSN: 09607692 ISSNe: 14690705 reponame:r-FSJD. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de la Fundació Sant Joan de Déu instname:Fundació Sant Joan de Déu |
| instname_str |
Fundació Sant Joan de Déu |
| reponame_str |
r-FSJD. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de la Fundació Sant Joan de Déu |
| collection |
r-FSJD. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de la Fundació Sant Joan de Déu |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869414969558171648 |
| score |
15.198674 |