Does verifying users influence rankings? Analyzing TripAdvisor and Booking.com

Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) is of recent and considerable importance in tourism, particularly because of the intangible nature of this industry. Users' online reviews are a source of information for other consumers, who take them into account before making a reservation at a lodging propert...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Martín Fuentes, Eva, Mateu Piñol, Carles, Fernàndez Camon, César
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10459.1/65390
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.3727/108354218X15143857349459
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/65390
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:eWOM
TripAdvisor
Booking.com
Ranking
Big Data
id ES_9e24ac3ae76c82271b2b4f4af3053692
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:10459.1/65390
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Does verifying users influence rankings? Analyzing TripAdvisor and Booking.comMartín Fuentes, EvaMateu Piñol, CarlesFernàndez Camon, CésareWOMTripAdvisorBooking.comRankingBig DataElectronic word of mouth (eWOM) is of recent and considerable importance in tourism, particularly because of the intangible nature of this industry. Users' online reviews are a source of information for other consumers, who take them into account before making a reservation at a lodging property. The aim of this study is to establish whether or not the anonymity of the reviews on TripAdvisor alters hotel rankings by comparing them with verified users' reviews on Booking.com. Moreover, the study analyzes whether or not the differences in the rating scales of both websites favor some hotels over others. Big data is used in this study, with more than 40,000 hotels on Booking.com and 70,000 on TripAdvisor in 447 cities around the world, and compares the rankings of about 20,000 hotels matched on both websites. Our findings suggest that the behavior of both rankings is similar and the lack of veracity on TripAdvisor due to the anonymity in the user's verification system is baseless. In addition, some differences are found depending on the hotel category and region, due mainly to the unique rating scale on Booking.com (from 2.5 to 10), as compared to the rating scale on TripAdvisor (from 1 to 5).This work was partially funded by the Spanish Ministry of the Economy and Competitiveness: research project TIN2015-71799-C2-2-P and ENE2015-64117-C5-1-R. This research article has received a grant for its linguistic revision from the Language Institute of the University of Lleida (2016 call).Cognizant Communication Corporation2018info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.3727/108354218X15143857349459http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/65390reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)Inglésinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//TIN2015-71799-C2-2-Pinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//ENE2015-64117-C5-1-RReproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.3727/108354218X15143857349459Tourism Analysis, 2018, vol. 23, núm. 1, p. 1-15(c) Cognizant Communication Corporation, 2018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:10459.1/653902026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does verifying users influence rankings? Analyzing TripAdvisor and Booking.com
title Does verifying users influence rankings? Analyzing TripAdvisor and Booking.com
spellingShingle Does verifying users influence rankings? Analyzing TripAdvisor and Booking.com
Martín Fuentes, Eva
eWOM
TripAdvisor
Booking.com
Ranking
Big Data
title_short Does verifying users influence rankings? Analyzing TripAdvisor and Booking.com
title_full Does verifying users influence rankings? Analyzing TripAdvisor and Booking.com
title_fullStr Does verifying users influence rankings? Analyzing TripAdvisor and Booking.com
title_full_unstemmed Does verifying users influence rankings? Analyzing TripAdvisor and Booking.com
title_sort Does verifying users influence rankings? Analyzing TripAdvisor and Booking.com
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Martín Fuentes, Eva
Mateu Piñol, Carles
Fernàndez Camon, César
author Martín Fuentes, Eva
author_facet Martín Fuentes, Eva
Mateu Piñol, Carles
Fernàndez Camon, César
author_role author
author2 Mateu Piñol, Carles
Fernàndez Camon, César
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv eWOM
TripAdvisor
Booking.com
Ranking
Big Data
topic eWOM
TripAdvisor
Booking.com
Ranking
Big Data
description Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) is of recent and considerable importance in tourism, particularly because of the intangible nature of this industry. Users' online reviews are a source of information for other consumers, who take them into account before making a reservation at a lodging property. The aim of this study is to establish whether or not the anonymity of the reviews on TripAdvisor alters hotel rankings by comparing them with verified users' reviews on Booking.com. Moreover, the study analyzes whether or not the differences in the rating scales of both websites favor some hotels over others. Big data is used in this study, with more than 40,000 hotels on Booking.com and 70,000 on TripAdvisor in 447 cities around the world, and compares the rankings of about 20,000 hotels matched on both websites. Our findings suggest that the behavior of both rankings is similar and the lack of veracity on TripAdvisor due to the anonymity in the user's verification system is baseless. In addition, some differences are found depending on the hotel category and region, due mainly to the unique rating scale on Booking.com (from 2.5 to 10), as compared to the rating scale on TripAdvisor (from 1 to 5).
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.3727/108354218X15143857349459
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/65390
url https://doi.org/10.3727/108354218X15143857349459
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/65390
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//TIN2015-71799-C2-2-P
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//ENE2015-64117-C5-1-R
Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.3727/108354218X15143857349459
Tourism Analysis, 2018, vol. 23, núm. 1, p. 1-15
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv (c) Cognizant Communication Corporation, 2018
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv (c) Cognizant Communication Corporation, 2018
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cognizant Communication Corporation
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cognizant Communication Corporation
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869414802043961344
score 15.812429

Similares en LA Referencia