Deepfakes, AI, and the Law: summary
The social phenomenon we broadly call ‘disinformation’ has multiple faces. The most common is fake news, a term as old as information itself, which monarchies and religious authorities were already concerned about and pursuing in the 16th century. The globalization of news dissemination—primarily du...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | informe técnico |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10230/72143 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72143 http://hdl.handle.net/10230/72143 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Deepfakes Artificial Intelligence Law |
| Resumo: | The social phenomenon we broadly call ‘disinformation’ has multiple faces. The most common is fake news, a term as old as information itself, which monarchies and religious authorities were already concerned about and pursuing in the 16th century. The globalization of news dissemination—primarily due to the invention of the World Wide Web in the 1990s, followed by the popularization of social media (today, a primary source of infor-mation for citizens, networks and platforms often reluctant to provide authorship or provenance data for what they publish)—and finally, the widespread use of artificial intelligence (starting in 2022, as an article by Wachter, Mittelstadt, and Russell states, it is doubtful that LLM systems have any obligation to tell the truth)1 have exponentially increased exposure to false, biased, or malicious content. The legal response to this is neither sim-ple nor internationally harmonized. |
|---|