Comparing surgically induced astigmatism calculated by means of simulated keratometry versus total corneal refractive power

Purpose: To evaluate surgically induced astigmatism as computed by means of either simulated keratometry (KSIM) or total corneal refractive power (TCRP) after temporal incisions. Methods: Prospective observational study including 36 right eyes undergoing cataract surgery. Astigmatism was measured pr...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Garzón Jiménez, Nuria, Rodríguez Vallejo, Manuel, Carmona González, David, Calvo Sanz, Jorge A., Poyales Galán, Francisco, Palomino Bautista, Carlos, Zato Gómez de Liaño, Miguel Á, Fernández, Joaquín
Tipo de documento: artigo
Data de publicação:2018
País:España
Recursos:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositório:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/18444
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/18444
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:617.753.3
617.713-089
617.741-004.1
Astigmatism
Cataract surgery
Posterior cornea
Multifocal intraocular lens
Surgically induced astigmatism
Cirugía
Oftalmología
Optometría
3213 Cirugía
3201.09 Oftalmología
2209.15 Optometría
Descrição
Resumo:Purpose: To evaluate surgically induced astigmatism as computed by means of either simulated keratometry (KSIM) or total corneal refractive power (TCRP) after temporal incisions. Methods: Prospective observational study including 36 right eyes undergoing cataract surgery. Astigmatism was measured preoperatively during the 3-month follow-up period using Pentacam. Surgically induced astigmatism was computed considering anterior corneal surface astigmatism at 3mm with KSIM and considering both corneal surfaces with TCRP from 1 to 8mm (TCRP3 for 3mm). The eyes under study were divided into two balanced groups: LOW with KSIM astigmatism <0.90D and HIGH with KSIM astigmatism ≥0.90D. Resulting surgically induced astigmatism values were compared across groups and measuring techniques by means of flattening, steepening, and torque analysis. Results: Mean surgically induced astigmatism was higher in the HIGH group (0.31D @ 102°) than in the LOW group (0.04 D @ 16°). The temporal incision resulted in a steepening in the HIGH group of 0.15 D @ 90°, as estimated with KSIM, versus 0.28 D @ 90° with TCRP3, but no significant differences were found for the steepening in the LOW group or for the torque in either group. Differences between KSIM- and TCRP3-based surgically induced astigmatism values were negligible in LOW group. Conclusion: Surgically induced astigmatism was considerably higher in the high-astigmatism group and its value was underestimated with the KSIM approach. Eyes having low astigmatism should not be included for computing the surgically induced astigmatism because steepening would be underestimated.