Bayle crític de Descartes: un escèptic al rescat del racionalisme?
This article focuses on Bayle’s interpretation of Cartesianism. While Descartes finds rationalism to be compatible with the omnipotent God of the Christian tradition, Bayle sustains that giving credence to the belief in God undermines rationalism, since rational evidence and an omnipotent God (the l...
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication Date: | 2017 |
| Country: | España |
| Institution: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repository: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10256/14714 |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10256/14714 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Bayle, Pierre, 1647-1706 Descartes, René, 1596-1650 Filosofia moderna Philosophy, Modern Racionalisme Rationalism Escepticisme Skepticism Ateisme Atheism |
| Summary: | This article focuses on Bayle’s interpretation of Cartesianism. While Descartes finds rationalism to be compatible with the omnipotent God of the Christian tradition, Bayle sustains that giving credence to the belief in God undermines rationalism, since rational evidence and an omnipotent God (the latter eventually fallacious) are logically irreconcilable. After analysing Descartes’ reasoning and Bayle’s arguments, their value is assessed and the consequences are explored |
|---|