International expert consensus statement: surgical failure in obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: Upper airway (UA) surgery is commonly employed in the treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The intricate pathophysiology of OSA, variability in sites and patterns of UA collapse, and the interaction between anatomical and non-anatomical factors in individual patients ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Iannella G, Pace A, Magliulo G, Vicini C, Lugo R, Vanderveken OM, de Vries N, Pang K, Thuler E, Jacobowitz O, Cahali MB, Maurer JT, Casale M, Moffa A, Salamanca F, Leone F, Olszewska E, Reina CO, Zancanella E, Hoff PT, Baptista P, Bahgat AY, Ravesloot MJL, van Maanen P, Goldberg A, Carrasco M, Agrawal VK, Lechien JR, De Vito A, Cammaroto G, De Virgilio A, Greco A, Mancini P, Perrone T, Amado S, Alkan U, Cheong RCT, D'Ecclesia A, Galantai D, RajuAnand A, Calvo-Henriquez C, Cocuzza S, Arigliani M, Saibene AM, Aragona RM, Maniaci A
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
Repositorio:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
OAI Identifier:oai:fisabio.fundanetsuite.com:p17816
Acceso en línea:https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/17816
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Clinical guidelines
Delphi method
Expert consensus
Obstructive sleep apnea
Sleep disorder management
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Upper airway (UA) surgery is commonly employed in the treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The intricate pathophysiology of OSA, variability in sites and patterns of UA collapse, and the interaction between anatomical and non-anatomical factors in individual patients may contribute to possible surgical failures. This clinical consensus statement aims to identify areas of agreement among a development group comprising international experts in OSA surgery, regarding the appropriate definition, predictive factors in patients, and management of surgical failure in OSA treatment. METHODS: A clinical consensus statement (CCS) was developed using the Delphi method by a panel of 35 contributors from various countries. A systematic literature review adhering to PRISMA guidelines was conducted. A survey consisting of 60 statements was then formulated and presented to the experts. RESULTS: Following two rounds of the Delphi process, consensus or strong consensus was achieved on 36 items, while 24 items remained without consensus. Specifically, 5 out of 10 statements reached consensus regarding on the 'Definition of Surgical Success/Failure after OSA Surgery'. Regarding the 'Predictive Factors of Surgical Failure in OSA Surgery', consensus was reached on 10 out of 13 statements. In the context of the 'Diagnostic Workup in OSA Surgery', consensus was achieved on 9 out of 13 statements. Lastly, in 'Treatment in Surgical Failure Cases', consensus was reached on 12 out of 24 statements. CONCLUSION: The management of OSA after surgical failure presents a significant clinical challenge for sleep specialists. This CCS provides valuable guidance for defining, preventing, and addressing surgical failures in the treatment of OSA syndrome.

Similares en LA Referencia