Future time perspective, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment:The mediating effect of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality
This study’s objective is to the mediating role of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality in the relationship that future time perspective has with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. A self-reported survey was applied to 299 MBA students with work experience. The hypotheses were tested by me...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Data de publicação: | 2018 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid |
| Repositório: | Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:journals.copmadrid.org:jwop/art/jwop2018a1 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a1 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Time perspective, Job satisfaction, Organizational commitment, Self-efficacy, Hope, Vitality Perspectiva de tiempo, Satisfacción laboral, Compromiso organizacional, Autoeficacia, Esperanza, Vitalidad |
| id |
ES_75c2501f5a21ac1f6a8c29eb878eb49c |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:journals.copmadrid.org:jwop/art/jwop2018a1 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Future time perspective, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment:The mediating effect of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality Perspectiva Futura de Tiempo, Satisfacción Laboral y Compromiso Organizacional: el Efecto Mediador de la Autoeficacia, la Esperanza y la Vitalidad |
| title |
Future time perspective, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment:The mediating effect of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality |
| spellingShingle |
Future time perspective, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment:The mediating effect of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality Mercado-Salgado, Patricia Time perspective, Job satisfaction, Organizational commitment, Self-efficacy, Hope, Vitality Perspectiva de tiempo, Satisfacción laboral, Compromiso organizacional, Autoeficacia, Esperanza, Vitalidad |
| title_short |
Future time perspective, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment:The mediating effect of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality |
| title_full |
Future time perspective, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment:The mediating effect of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality |
| title_fullStr |
Future time perspective, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment:The mediating effect of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Future time perspective, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment:The mediating effect of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality |
| title_sort |
Future time perspective, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment:The mediating effect of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Mercado-Salgado, Patricia |
| author |
Mercado-Salgado, Patricia |
| author_facet |
Mercado-Salgado, Patricia |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Time perspective, Job satisfaction, Organizational commitment, Self-efficacy, Hope, Vitality Perspectiva de tiempo, Satisfacción laboral, Compromiso organizacional, Autoeficacia, Esperanza, Vitalidad |
| topic |
Time perspective, Job satisfaction, Organizational commitment, Self-efficacy, Hope, Vitality Perspectiva de tiempo, Satisfacción laboral, Compromiso organizacional, Autoeficacia, Esperanza, Vitalidad |
| description |
This study’s objective is to the mediating role of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality in the relationship that future time perspective has with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. A self-reported survey was applied to 299 MBA students with work experience. The hypotheses were tested by means of a mediation analysis utilizing linear regression. The results suggest that the three factors taken into consideration mediate the relationship between future time perspective and job satisfaction. Also, findings indicate that while self-efficacy and hope mediate the relationship between future time perspective and organizational commitment, vitality does not. This study suggests that association between future time perspective and the attitudes under examination is not direct, but rather, is conveyed, to a higher or lower degree, through various factors that differ in mediating power. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/published |
| format |
article |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a1 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a1 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Español |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Español |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
/*ref*/N. Allen, J. P. Meyer(1990) The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology 63(), 1-18 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x /*ref*/A. Bandura(1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 34(), 191-252 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 /*ref*/A. Bandura, E. Locke(2003) Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(), 87-99 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87 /*ref*/R. Baron, D. Kenny(1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(), 1173-1182 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 /*ref*/A. H. Brayfield, H. F. Rothe(1951) An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology 35(), 307-311 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055617 /*ref*/D. A. Cernas-Ortiz, M. A. Davis(2016) Future and past negative time perspective influences on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in Mexico and the United States. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management 14(), 317-338 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-04-2016-0665 /*ref*/S. Colarelli, R. Arvey(2015) . The Biological Foundations of Organizational BehaviorThe University of Chicago Press (), DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-04-2016-0665 /*ref*/V. Corral-Verdugo, B. Fraijo-Sing, J. Pinheiro(2006) Sustainable behavior and time perspective: Present, past, and future orientations and their relationship with water conservation behavior. Revista Interamericana de Psicología 40(), 139-147 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-04-2016-0665 /*ref*/E. Epel, A. Bandura, P. Zimbardo(1999) Escaping hopelessness: The influences of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29(), 575-596 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01402.x /*ref*/M. Gits, T. Mitchell(1992) Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Journal 17(), 183-211 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279530 /*ref*/D. Harrison, D. Newman, P. Roth(2006) How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal 49(), 305-325 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786077 /*ref*/A. Hayes(2013) . Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. A Regression-Based ApproachThe Guilford Press (), DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786077 /*ref*/T. Judge, J. Bono(2001) Relationship of core self-evaluations traits -self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability- with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 86(), 80-92 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.1.80 /*ref*/R. B. Kline(2011) . Principles and Practice of Structural Equation ModelingGuilford Press (), DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.1.80 /*ref*/M. Lindell, D. Whitney(2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology 86(), 114-121 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114 /*ref*/E. Locke(1969) What is job satisfaction?. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 4(), 309-226 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90013-0 /*ref*/E. Locke, G. Latham(1990) . A Theory of Goal Setting and Task PerformancePrentice-Hall (), DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90013-0 /*ref*/E. Locke, G Latham(2009) Has goal setting gone wild, or have its attackers abandoned good scholarship?. Academy of Management Perspectives 23(), 17-23 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2009.37008000 /*ref*/J. Methot, D. Lepak, A. Shipp, W. Boswell(2017) Good citizen interrupted: Calibrating a theory of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal 42(), 10-31 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0415 /*ref*/S. Motowidlo(1996) Orientation toward the job and the organization. Individual Differences in Behavior and OrganizationsJossey-Bass (), 175-208 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0415 /*ref*/J. Navarro, R. A. Roe, M. I. Artiles(2015) Taking time seriously: Changing practices and perspectives in work/organizational psychology. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 31(), 135-145 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2015.07.002 /*ref*/I. Park, H. Jung(2015) Relationships among future time perspective, career and organizational commitment, occupational self-efficacy and turnover intention. Social Behavior and Personality 43(), 1547-1562 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.9.1547 /*ref*/N. Park, C. Peterson, M. Seligman(2004) Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 23(), 603-619 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748 /*ref*/C. Peterson, N. Park, N. Hall, M. Seligman(2009) Zest and work. Journal of Organizational Behavior 30(), 161-172 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.584 /*ref*/L. Porter, R. Steers, R. Mowday(2007) . Great Minds in Management. The Process of Theory ConstructionOxford University Press (), 171-189 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.584 /*ref*/R. Ryan, C. Frederick(1997) On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality 65(), 529-565 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x /*ref*/B. Schyns, G von Collani(2002) A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 2(), 219-241 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320244000148 /*ref*/A. Shipp, J. Edwards, L. Lambert(2009) Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 110(), 1-22 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001 /*ref*/C. R. Snyder, L. Irving, J. R. Anderson(1991) . Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology: The Health PerspectivePergamon Press (), 285-305 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001 /*ref*/C.R. Snyder, K. Rand, E. King, D. Feldman, J. Woodward(2002) “False” hope. Journal of Clinical Psychology 58(), 1003-1022 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10096 /*ref*/C.R. Snyder, S. Sympson, F. Ybasco, T. Borders, M. Babyak, R. Higgins(1996) Development and validations of the state hope scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(), 321-335 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.2.321 /*ref*/M. Sobel(1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. Sociological Methodology 13(), 290-312 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/270723 /*ref*/P. Spector(2006) Method variance in organizational research. Truth or urban legend?. Organizational Research Methods 9(), 221-232 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955 /*ref*/M. Stolarski, G. Mattews, S. Postek, P. Zimbardo, J. Bitner(2014) How we feel is a matter of time: Relationship between time perspective and mood. Journal of Happiness Studies 15(), 809-827 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9450-y /*ref*/M. Strobel, A. Tumasjan, M. Spörrle, I. Welpe(2013) The future starts today, not tomorrow: How future focus promotes organizational citizenship behaviors. Human Relations 66(), 829-856 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712470709 /*ref*/H. Vinarski-Peretz, G. Binyamin, A. Carmeli(2011) Subjective relational experiences and employee innovative behaviors in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior 78(), 290-304 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.09.005 /*ref*/E. J. Wolf, K. M. Harrington, S. L. Clark, M. W. Miller(2013) Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement 73(), 913-934 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237 /*ref*/J. Zhang, R. Howell(2011) Do time perspectives predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond personality traits?. Personality and Individual Differences 50(), 1261-1266 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.021 /*ref*/P. Zimbardo, J. Boyd(1999) Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(), 1271-1288 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1271 /*ref*/P. Zimbardo, K. Keough, J. Boyd(1997) Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences 23(), 1007-1023 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00113-x |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES Copyright © 2026. Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES Copyright © 2026. Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/xml |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colegio Oficial de Psicologos de Madrid |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colegio Oficial de Psicologos de Madrid |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology instname:Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid |
| instname_str |
Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid |
| reponame_str |
Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology |
| collection |
Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869411003481980928 |
| spelling |
Future time perspective, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment:The mediating effect of self-efficacy, hope, and vitalityPerspectiva Futura de Tiempo, Satisfacción Laboral y Compromiso Organizacional: el Efecto Mediador de la Autoeficacia, la Esperanza y la VitalidadMercado-Salgado, PatriciaTime perspective, Job satisfaction, Organizational commitment, Self-efficacy, Hope, VitalityPerspectiva de tiempo, Satisfacción laboral, Compromiso organizacional, Autoeficacia, Esperanza, VitalidadThis study’s objective is to the mediating role of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality in the relationship that future time perspective has with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. A self-reported survey was applied to 299 MBA students with work experience. The hypotheses were tested by means of a mediation analysis utilizing linear regression. The results suggest that the three factors taken into consideration mediate the relationship between future time perspective and job satisfaction. Also, findings indicate that while self-efficacy and hope mediate the relationship between future time perspective and organizational commitment, vitality does not. This study suggests that association between future time perspective and the attitudes under examination is not direct, but rather, is conveyed, to a higher or lower degree, through various factors that differ in mediating power.El objetivo de este trabajo es examinar el efecto mediador de la autoficacia, la esperanza y la vitalidad en la relación de la perspectiva futura de tiempo con la satisfacción laboral y el compromiso organizacional. Se aplicó un cuestionario autoinformado a 299 estudiantes de máster con experiencia laboral. Las hipótesis se probaron mediante un análisis de mediación utilizando regresión lineal. Los resultados indican que los tres factores considerados median la relación entre la perspectiva futura de tiempo y la satisfacción laboral. También se encontró que mientras que la autoeficacia y la esperanza median la relación entre la perspectiva futura de tiempo y el compromiso organizacional, la vitalidad no lo hace. Este estudio sugiere que la asociación entre la perspectiva futura de tiempo y las actitudes analizadas no es directa, sino que se transmite, en mayor o menor medida, a través de factores que varían en poder de mediación.Colegio Oficial de Psicologos de Madrid2018info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/xmlhttps://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a1reponame:Journal of Work and Organizational Psychologyinstname:Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de MadridEspañol/*ref*/N. Allen, J. P. Meyer(1990) The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology 63(), 1-18 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x/*ref*/A. Bandura(1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 34(), 191-252 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191/*ref*/A. Bandura, E. Locke(2003) Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(), 87-99 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87/*ref*/R. Baron, D. Kenny(1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(), 1173-1182 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173/*ref*/A. H. Brayfield, H. F. Rothe(1951) An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology 35(), 307-311 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055617/*ref*/D. A. Cernas-Ortiz, M. A. Davis(2016) Future and past negative time perspective influences on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in Mexico and the United States. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management 14(), 317-338 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-04-2016-0665/*ref*/S. Colarelli, R. Arvey(2015) . The Biological Foundations of Organizational BehaviorThe University of Chicago Press (), DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-04-2016-0665/*ref*/V. Corral-Verdugo, B. Fraijo-Sing, J. Pinheiro(2006) Sustainable behavior and time perspective: Present, past, and future orientations and their relationship with water conservation behavior. Revista Interamericana de Psicología 40(), 139-147 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/mrjiam-04-2016-0665/*ref*/E. Epel, A. Bandura, P. Zimbardo(1999) Escaping hopelessness: The influences of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29(), 575-596 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01402.x/*ref*/M. Gits, T. Mitchell(1992) Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Journal 17(), 183-211 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279530/*ref*/D. Harrison, D. Newman, P. Roth(2006) How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal 49(), 305-325 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786077/*ref*/A. Hayes(2013) . Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. A Regression-Based ApproachThe Guilford Press (), DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786077/*ref*/T. Judge, J. Bono(2001) Relationship of core self-evaluations traits -self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability- with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 86(), 80-92 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.1.80/*ref*/R. B. Kline(2011) . Principles and Practice of Structural Equation ModelingGuilford Press (), DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.1.80/*ref*/M. Lindell, D. Whitney(2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology 86(), 114-121 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114/*ref*/E. Locke(1969) What is job satisfaction?. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 4(), 309-226 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90013-0/*ref*/E. Locke, G. Latham(1990) . A Theory of Goal Setting and Task PerformancePrentice-Hall (), DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90013-0/*ref*/E. Locke, G Latham(2009) Has goal setting gone wild, or have its attackers abandoned good scholarship?. Academy of Management Perspectives 23(), 17-23 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2009.37008000/*ref*/J. Methot, D. Lepak, A. Shipp, W. Boswell(2017) Good citizen interrupted: Calibrating a theory of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal 42(), 10-31 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0415/*ref*/S. Motowidlo(1996) Orientation toward the job and the organization. Individual Differences in Behavior and OrganizationsJossey-Bass (), 175-208 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0415/*ref*/J. Navarro, R. A. Roe, M. I. Artiles(2015) Taking time seriously: Changing practices and perspectives in work/organizational psychology. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 31(), 135-145 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2015.07.002/*ref*/I. Park, H. Jung(2015) Relationships among future time perspective, career and organizational commitment, occupational self-efficacy and turnover intention. Social Behavior and Personality 43(), 1547-1562 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.9.1547/*ref*/N. Park, C. Peterson, M. Seligman(2004) Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 23(), 603-619 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748/*ref*/C. Peterson, N. Park, N. Hall, M. Seligman(2009) Zest and work. Journal of Organizational Behavior 30(), 161-172 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.584/*ref*/L. Porter, R. Steers, R. Mowday(2007) . Great Minds in Management. The Process of Theory ConstructionOxford University Press (), 171-189 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.584/*ref*/R. Ryan, C. Frederick(1997) On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality 65(), 529-565 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x/*ref*/B. Schyns, G von Collani(2002) A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 2(), 219-241 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320244000148/*ref*/A. Shipp, J. Edwards, L. Lambert(2009) Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 110(), 1-22 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001/*ref*/C. R. Snyder, L. Irving, J. R. Anderson(1991) . Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology: The Health PerspectivePergamon Press (), 285-305 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001/*ref*/C.R. Snyder, K. Rand, E. King, D. Feldman, J. Woodward(2002) “False” hope. Journal of Clinical Psychology 58(), 1003-1022 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10096/*ref*/C.R. Snyder, S. Sympson, F. Ybasco, T. Borders, M. Babyak, R. Higgins(1996) Development and validations of the state hope scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(), 321-335 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.2.321/*ref*/M. Sobel(1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. Sociological Methodology 13(), 290-312 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/270723/*ref*/P. Spector(2006) Method variance in organizational research. Truth or urban legend?. Organizational Research Methods 9(), 221-232 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955/*ref*/M. Stolarski, G. Mattews, S. Postek, P. Zimbardo, J. Bitner(2014) How we feel is a matter of time: Relationship between time perspective and mood. Journal of Happiness Studies 15(), 809-827 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9450-y/*ref*/M. Strobel, A. Tumasjan, M. Spörrle, I. Welpe(2013) The future starts today, not tomorrow: How future focus promotes organizational citizenship behaviors. Human Relations 66(), 829-856 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712470709/*ref*/H. Vinarski-Peretz, G. Binyamin, A. Carmeli(2011) Subjective relational experiences and employee innovative behaviors in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior 78(), 290-304 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.09.005/*ref*/E. J. Wolf, K. M. Harrington, S. L. Clark, M. W. Miller(2013) Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement 73(), 913-934 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237/*ref*/J. Zhang, R. Howell(2011) Do time perspectives predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond personality traits?. Personality and Individual Differences 50(), 1261-1266 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.021/*ref*/P. Zimbardo, J. Boyd(1999) Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(), 1271-1288 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1271/*ref*/P. Zimbardo, K. Keough, J. Boyd(1997) Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences 23(), 1007-1023 DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00113-xhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es_ESCopyright © 2026. Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madridinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:journals.copmadrid.org:jwop/art/jwop2018a12026-06-23T12:47:17Z |
| score |
15.301629 |