Aplicación del ‘sistema abierto’ en el proyecto contemporáneo. La obra de Mansilla+Tuñón y Nieto Sobejano, siglo XXI.
Mansilla+Tuñón and Nieto Sobejano began the 21st century with projects that updated the open system project strategy, initiated in the 1950s by architects who, as a critique of the functional, proposed strategies akin to structuralism, sensitive to a complex and changing reality. Their update includ...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Data de publicação: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha |
| Repositório: | RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/45228 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://doi.org/10.31921/constelaciones.n13a5 https://revistascientificas.uspceu.com/constelaciones/article/view/2806 https://hdl.handle.net/10578/45228 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Arquitectura contemporánea española Campos Contemporary spanish architecture Estructuralismo Fields Formas de grupo Group forms Mansilla+Tuñón Modules Módulos Nieto Sobejano Open System Sistemas Abiertos Structuralism |
| Resumo: | Mansilla+Tuñón and Nieto Sobejano began the 21st century with projects that updated the open system project strategy, initiated in the 1950s by architects who, as a critique of the functional, proposed strategies akin to structuralism, sensitive to a complex and changing reality. Their update includes features that extend the capacity and purposes of those early open systems. The article contains two parts. The first provides a taxonomic synthesis of what we consider open systems, grouped into three families --modules and group forms; tree-like structures and megastructures; wefts and field systems-- and identifies their main formal features. The second, selects several systematic projects by Mansilla+Tuñón and Nieto Sobejano from the 21st century, elucidates their adaptation to contemporary aspects such as legibility, contextualism and relationship with nature. It concludes by corroborating the validity of the strategy, although it warns about the formalist risk of using it as an end in itself. |
|---|