Multi directional pushover analysis of irregular masonry buildings without box behavior

This paper proposes the use of multiple nonlinear static analyses for the seismic assessment of irregular masonry buildings without box behavior. The methodology consists in executing a series of sequential pushover analyses on the spatial model of the building by rotating the horizontal loading dir...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Kalkbrenner, Philip, Pelà, Luca|||0000-0001-7760-8290, Sandoval Mandujano, Cristian Eliseo
Tipo de documento: artigo
Data de publicação:2019
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Repositório:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/174007
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/2117/174007
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109534
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Masonry--Maintenance and repair
Masonry structure
Nonlinear static analysis
N2 method
Nonlinear dynamic analysis
Structural irregularity
Flexible diaphragm
Local collapse mechanism
Out-of-plane mechanism
Seismic assessment
Earthquake engineering
Estructures de murs -- Models matemàtics
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Materials i estructures
Descrição
Resumo:This paper proposes the use of multiple nonlinear static analyses for the seismic assessment of irregular masonry buildings without box behavior. The methodology consists in executing a series of sequential pushover analyses on the spatial model of the building by rotating the horizontal loading direction from to . The so-called multi directional pushover analysis allows a more realistic evaluation of the seismic vulnerability, since it can represent a higher number of possible failure mechanisms than in the conventional pushover analysis restricted to the two “principal” directions of the structure. The application of the methodology to a highly irregular masonry building located in Chile shows that the detected failure mechanisms are in very good agreement with those derived from nonlinear dynamic analysis, as well as with the damage experienced by the structure after the earthquake of February 27, 2010 (Mw 8.8).