Ancient masonry arches and vaults strengthened with TRM, SRG and FRP composites: Numerical analyses
[EN] The two arches and the three vaults experimentally described in Carozzi et al. (2017) are here analyzed with a novel robust FE lower bound limit analysis code, suitable to predict active failure mechanisms, lines of thrust and collapse loads in absence and presence of TRM, SRG and FRP reinforce...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repositorio: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/143788 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/143788 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Masonry Arches and vaults Textile Reinforced Mortar TRM Fiber Reinforced Polymer FRP Steel Reinforced Grout SRG Numerical modelling LOwer BOund Limit Analysis (LOBOLA) |
| Sumario: | [EN] The two arches and the three vaults experimentally described in Carozzi et al. (2017) are here analyzed with a novel robust FE lower bound limit analysis code, suitable to predict active failure mechanisms, lines of thrust and collapse loads in absence and presence of TRM, SRG and FRP reinforcement. The approach relies into a discretization into rigid-infinitely resistant quadrilateral elements for masonry, interfaces between contiguous elements exhibiting limited strength and perfectly bonded rigid-plastic trusses representing the reinforcement. For masonry, a No Tension Material NTM model can be adopted to compare with classic Heyman¿s results, but also a limited compressive and tensile strength with a cohesive frictional behavior in shear may be accounted for in a relatively simple fashion, i.e. in principle with the possibility to model shear sliding and compression crushing. Debonding and delamination of the reinforcement are considered in a conventional way, assuming trusses with a limited tensile strength derived from either experimental data available or consolidated formulas from the literature. With the knowledge of the exact position of the hinges provided by limit analysis, 2D FE static analyses with non-linearity and softening concentrated exclusively on hinges are carried out, to simply extend the knowledge beyond collapse loads estimation towards a prediction of initial stiffness and ultimate displacements. In all cases, promising agreement with experiments is observed. |
|---|