A protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse genres
The present article contributes to research on evaluation by addressing two complementary objectives: first, we present a protocol for the identification and annotation of evaluation in English discourse and, second, we show the results of the implementation of the protocol in the annotation of eval...
| Autores: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Data de publicação: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad de Cantabria (UC) |
| Repositório: | UCrea Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de Cantabria |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.unican.es:10902/36164 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://hdl.handle.net/10902/36164 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Evaluation Stance Evaluative metaphor Evaluation annotation Evaluation in genres Evaluación Posicionamiento Metáfora evaluativa Anotación de la evaluación Evaluación en géneros discursivos |
| id |
ES_54106083b26bb093edcf5e8fc6f92fdf |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unican.es:10902/36164 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
A protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse genresHidalgo Downing, LauraPérez Sobrino, PaulaFilardo Llamas, LauraMaíz Arévalo, CarmenNúñez Perucha, BegoñaSánchez Moya, AlfonsoWilliams Camus, Julia Teresa|||0000-0001-9201-4650EvaluationStanceEvaluative metaphorEvaluation annotationEvaluation in genresEvaluaciónPosicionamientoMetáfora evaluativaAnotación de la evaluaciónEvaluación en géneros discursivosThe present article contributes to research on evaluation by addressing two complementary objectives: first, we present a protocol for the identification and annotation of evaluation in English discourse and, second, we show the results of the implementation of the protocol in the annotation of evaluation in a sample of a corpus of four genres. We first describe the protocol by discussing the theoretical and methodological grounding of the annotation scheme, the criteria, the categories, the steps for the implementation of the protocol and an illustrative example of the application of the protocol to a short extract. We subsequently provide the preliminary results of a pilot study with the frequency of evaluative expressions across the four genres. Results show that while adjectives and non-metaphoric evaluative expressions are overall more frequent, there are differences regarding the preference for positive or negative value and regarding the frequency of function.Este articulo contribuye a la investigación sobre la evaluación al abordar dos objetivos complementarios: en primer lugar, presentamos un protocolo para la identificación y anotación de la evaluación en el discurso en lengua inglesa; y, en segundo lugar, mostramos los resultados obtenidos al implementar dicho protocolo en una muestra de un corpus de cuatro géneros discursivos. Comenzamos con la descripción del protocolo y la fundamentación teórica y metodológica del mismo, asi como los criterios, los pasos para la implementación del protocolo y un ejemplo ilustrativo de su aplicación a un texto breve. A continuación, presentamos los resultados preliminares de un estudio piloto sobre la frecuencia de las expresiones evaluativas en cuatro géneros discursivos. Los resultados muestran que los adjetivos y las expresiones evaluativas no metafóricas son más frecuentes, pero hay diferencias en los diferentes géneros en la frecuencia de la evaluación positiva o negativa y la frecuencia de las funciones.The present study was carried out within the research project entitled “Stance and Inter/Subjectivity in Discourse” (PGC2018-095798), funded by the SpanishMinistry of Science, Innovation and Universities. Funding has also been granted from other research projects funded by the State Agency of Research – Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (FFI2017-82730-P, PID2020-118349GB-I00 and PID2021-123302NB-I00) and the Government of Aragon (LMP143_21).SGEL-EducaciónUniversidad de Cantabria20242024-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501NAhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://hdl.handle.net/10902/36164Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 2024, 37(2), 486-517reponame:UCrea Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de Cantabriainstname:Universidad de Cantabria (UC)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositorio.unican.es:10902/361642026-06-02T12:39:31Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse genres |
| title |
A protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse genres |
| spellingShingle |
A protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse genres Hidalgo Downing, Laura Evaluation Stance Evaluative metaphor Evaluation annotation Evaluation in genres Evaluación Posicionamiento Metáfora evaluativa Anotación de la evaluación Evaluación en géneros discursivos |
| title_short |
A protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse genres |
| title_full |
A protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse genres |
| title_fullStr |
A protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse genres |
| title_full_unstemmed |
A protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse genres |
| title_sort |
A protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse genres |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Hidalgo Downing, Laura Pérez Sobrino, Paula Filardo Llamas, Laura Maíz Arévalo, Carmen Núñez Perucha, Begoña Sánchez Moya, Alfonso Williams Camus, Julia Teresa|||0000-0001-9201-4650 |
| author |
Hidalgo Downing, Laura |
| author_facet |
Hidalgo Downing, Laura Pérez Sobrino, Paula Filardo Llamas, Laura Maíz Arévalo, Carmen Núñez Perucha, Begoña Sánchez Moya, Alfonso Williams Camus, Julia Teresa|||0000-0001-9201-4650 |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Pérez Sobrino, Paula Filardo Llamas, Laura Maíz Arévalo, Carmen Núñez Perucha, Begoña Sánchez Moya, Alfonso Williams Camus, Julia Teresa|||0000-0001-9201-4650 |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Cantabria |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation Stance Evaluative metaphor Evaluation annotation Evaluation in genres Evaluación Posicionamiento Metáfora evaluativa Anotación de la evaluación Evaluación en géneros discursivos |
| topic |
Evaluation Stance Evaluative metaphor Evaluation annotation Evaluation in genres Evaluación Posicionamiento Metáfora evaluativa Anotación de la evaluación Evaluación en géneros discursivos |
| description |
The present article contributes to research on evaluation by addressing two complementary objectives: first, we present a protocol for the identification and annotation of evaluation in English discourse and, second, we show the results of the implementation of the protocol in the annotation of evaluation in a sample of a corpus of four genres. We first describe the protocol by discussing the theoretical and methodological grounding of the annotation scheme, the criteria, the categories, the steps for the implementation of the protocol and an illustrative example of the application of the protocol to a short extract. We subsequently provide the preliminary results of a pilot study with the frequency of evaluative expressions across the four genres. Results show that while adjectives and non-metaphoric evaluative expressions are overall more frequent, there are differences regarding the preference for positive or negative value and regarding the frequency of function. |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024 2024-01-01 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
journal article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 NA http://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43 |
| dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10902/36164 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10902/36164 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés eng |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
open access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
open access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SGEL-Educación |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SGEL-Educación |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 2024, 37(2), 486-517 reponame:UCrea Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de Cantabria instname:Universidad de Cantabria (UC) |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Cantabria (UC) |
| reponame_str |
UCrea Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de Cantabria |
| collection |
UCrea Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de Cantabria |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869408159291932672 |
| score |
15.812455 |