Fairwork Spain Ratings 2024: a long way to go for labour protection in the platform economy

This is the first-ever report in Spain based on the Fairwork methodology. It evaluates the working and employment conditions of seven digital platforms in four economic sectors: delivery, in the case of Just Eat, Glovo and the cooperative La Pájara; ride-hailing, with the Cabify and Uber platforms;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Lahera Sánchez, Arturo, Riesco Sanz, José Alberto, Arnal Sarasa, María Dolores, Briales Canseco, Álvaro, Meseguer Gancedo, Pablo, Negro Macho, Ana, Ramírez Melgarejo, Antonio José, Revilla Castro, Juan Carlos, Tovar Martínez, Francisco José, Bertolini, Alessio, Graham, Mark
Tipo de recurso: informe técnico
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/106774
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/106774
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Platform capitalism
Fairwork
Platform economy
Gig economy
Spain
working conditions
Economía
Sociología
Trabajo
63 Sociología
6306 Sociología del Trabajo
id ES_4c23db7d13a927bc079f3bde241e7fde
oai_identifier_str oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/106774
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Fairwork Spain Ratings 2024: a long way to go for labour protection in the platform economyFairwork España. Puntuaciones 2024: un largo camino aún por recorrer para la protección del trabajo en la economía de plataformaLahera Sánchez, ArturoRiesco Sanz, José AlbertoArnal Sarasa, María DoloresBriales Canseco, ÁlvaroMeseguer Gancedo, PabloNegro Macho, AnaRamírez Melgarejo, Antonio JoséRevilla Castro, Juan CarlosTovar Martínez, Francisco JoséBertolini, AlessioGraham, MarkPlatform capitalismFairworkPlatform economyGig economySpainworking conditionsEconomíaSociologíaTrabajo63 Sociología6306 Sociología del TrabajoThis is the first-ever report in Spain based on the Fairwork methodology. It evaluates the working and employment conditions of seven digital platforms in four economic sectors: delivery, in the case of Just Eat, Glovo and the cooperative La Pájara; ride-hailing, with the Cabify and Uber platforms; moving, home maintenance and mounting services, with the experience of Taskrabbit; and home cleaning services in the case of MyPoppins. The analysis of these seven platforms has focused on Fairwork’s five principles for ensuring fair and decent work, the contents of which are presented in detail in this report: fair pay, fair conditions, fair contracts, fair management, and fair representation. The research found the majority of these companies were unable to evidence a minimum standard of fair work. The La Pájara cooperative obtained eight points out of a possible 10. The Just Eat platform scored seven points, while Cabify, Uber, and TaskRabbit scored just two points. The remaining two platforms, Glovo and MyPoppins have not provided sufficient evidence to be awarded any of the 10 possible points. These findings suggest that many of the around 2.6% of working-age people in Spain who depend on platform work as their main source of income (and the up to 18.5% who work via platforms more occasionally) face low pay and dangerous conditions at work. Given Spain’s reputation for innovative regulatory interventions meant to protect gig workers (namely its “Rider Law”) the findings of this report are important for pointing to the gaps that still exist in its protections for workers.FairworkUniversidad Complutense de Madrid20242024-01-0120242024-01-01technical reporthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ghVoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/reportapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/106774reponame:Docta Complutenseinstname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/1067742026-06-02T12:44:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fairwork Spain Ratings 2024: a long way to go for labour protection in the platform economy
Fairwork España. Puntuaciones 2024: un largo camino aún por recorrer para la protección del trabajo en la economía de plataforma
title Fairwork Spain Ratings 2024: a long way to go for labour protection in the platform economy
spellingShingle Fairwork Spain Ratings 2024: a long way to go for labour protection in the platform economy
Lahera Sánchez, Arturo
Platform capitalism
Fairwork
Platform economy
Gig economy
Spain
working conditions
Economía
Sociología
Trabajo
63 Sociología
6306 Sociología del Trabajo
title_short Fairwork Spain Ratings 2024: a long way to go for labour protection in the platform economy
title_full Fairwork Spain Ratings 2024: a long way to go for labour protection in the platform economy
title_fullStr Fairwork Spain Ratings 2024: a long way to go for labour protection in the platform economy
title_full_unstemmed Fairwork Spain Ratings 2024: a long way to go for labour protection in the platform economy
title_sort Fairwork Spain Ratings 2024: a long way to go for labour protection in the platform economy
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lahera Sánchez, Arturo
Riesco Sanz, José Alberto
Arnal Sarasa, María Dolores
Briales Canseco, Álvaro
Meseguer Gancedo, Pablo
Negro Macho, Ana
Ramírez Melgarejo, Antonio José
Revilla Castro, Juan Carlos
Tovar Martínez, Francisco José
Bertolini, Alessio
Graham, Mark
author Lahera Sánchez, Arturo
author_facet Lahera Sánchez, Arturo
Riesco Sanz, José Alberto
Arnal Sarasa, María Dolores
Briales Canseco, Álvaro
Meseguer Gancedo, Pablo
Negro Macho, Ana
Ramírez Melgarejo, Antonio José
Revilla Castro, Juan Carlos
Tovar Martínez, Francisco José
Bertolini, Alessio
Graham, Mark
author_role author
author2 Riesco Sanz, José Alberto
Arnal Sarasa, María Dolores
Briales Canseco, Álvaro
Meseguer Gancedo, Pablo
Negro Macho, Ana
Ramírez Melgarejo, Antonio José
Revilla Castro, Juan Carlos
Tovar Martínez, Francisco José
Bertolini, Alessio
Graham, Mark
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Complutense de Madrid
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Platform capitalism
Fairwork
Platform economy
Gig economy
Spain
working conditions
Economía
Sociología
Trabajo
63 Sociología
6306 Sociología del Trabajo
topic Platform capitalism
Fairwork
Platform economy
Gig economy
Spain
working conditions
Economía
Sociología
Trabajo
63 Sociología
6306 Sociología del Trabajo
description This is the first-ever report in Spain based on the Fairwork methodology. It evaluates the working and employment conditions of seven digital platforms in four economic sectors: delivery, in the case of Just Eat, Glovo and the cooperative La Pájara; ride-hailing, with the Cabify and Uber platforms; moving, home maintenance and mounting services, with the experience of Taskrabbit; and home cleaning services in the case of MyPoppins. The analysis of these seven platforms has focused on Fairwork’s five principles for ensuring fair and decent work, the contents of which are presented in detail in this report: fair pay, fair conditions, fair contracts, fair management, and fair representation. The research found the majority of these companies were unable to evidence a minimum standard of fair work. The La Pájara cooperative obtained eight points out of a possible 10. The Just Eat platform scored seven points, while Cabify, Uber, and TaskRabbit scored just two points. The remaining two platforms, Glovo and MyPoppins have not provided sufficient evidence to be awarded any of the 10 possible points. These findings suggest that many of the around 2.6% of working-age people in Spain who depend on platform work as their main source of income (and the up to 18.5% who work via platforms more occasionally) face low pay and dangerous conditions at work. Given Spain’s reputation for innovative regulatory interventions meant to protect gig workers (namely its “Rider Law”) the findings of this report are important for pointing to the gaps that still exist in its protections for workers.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
2024-01-01
2024
2024-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv technical report
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/report
format report
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/106774
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/106774
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fairwork
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fairwork
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Docta Complutense
instname:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
instname_str Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
reponame_str Docta Complutense
collection Docta Complutense
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869407607928651776
score 15,812455