Extended momentum model for assessing strut aerodynamic losses in vertical axis wind turbines

Vertical axis wind turbines offer significant potential for urban and offshore energy, yet parasitic drag from supporting struts frequently compromises their aerodynamic efficiency. Existing strut design tools are limited, leaving a gap between simplified analytical models and computationally expens...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Suárez Fernández, Laura, Santamaría Bertolín, Luis|||0000-0001-8028-3837, Argüelles Díaz, Katia María, Fernández Oro, Jesús Manuel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2026
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Oviedo (UNIOVI)
Repositorio:RUO. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:dnet:ruo_________::4e6c5247e901d933e138beaf0d5df71f
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/10651/84105
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2026.121232
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Aerodynamic performance
DMST model
Parasitic losses
Strut design
Urban wind energy
Vertical axis wind turbine
Descrição
Resumo:Vertical axis wind turbines offer significant potential for urban and offshore energy, yet parasitic drag from supporting struts frequently compromises their aerodynamic efficiency. Existing strut design tools are limited, leaving a gap between simplified analytical models and computationally expensive fluid dynamics simulations. This study presents a rapid, reliable method for assessing these losses by extending the double-disk multiple streamtube (DMST) framework. The model analyzes three-dimensional realistic strut designs, integrating parasitic drag and blade-strut junction interference. Validated against computational fluid dynamic simulations, the approach was tested on an urban H-rotor turbine featuring hollow, ribbed, variable section struts with distinct airfoils. Quantitative analysis revealed that the root 30% of the strut contributes only 1% to total losses, and while the thin NACA0009 reduced the maximum power coefficient by a minimal 2.8%, the thick E863 strut caused a massive 50.3% reduction in performance, driven primarily by a 39.6% drop attributed solely to junction interference drag. While strut thickness is critical for small-scale efficiency, the relative impact of parasitic losses diminishes significantly as turbine scale and operating Reynolds numbers increase. Ultimately, the developed tool enables future research to address the full complexity of multidisciplinary strut design optimization.