Epitaxial growth of celestite on barite (001) face at a molecular scale
In situ AFM experiments have been conducted in order to obtain information about kinetics of celestite epitaxial growth on barite. Growth has been promoted by passing aqueous solutions supersaturated with respect to celestite over freshly cleaved barite (001) surfaces. Solution supersaturation, bcel...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Data de publicação: | 2005 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) |
| Repositório: | Docta Complutense |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/49782 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/49782 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | 548.5 Surface topography Atomic force microscopy Epitaxy Solid–liquid interfaces Cristalografía (Geología) |
| Resumo: | In situ AFM experiments have been conducted in order to obtain information about kinetics of celestite epitaxial growth on barite. Growth has been promoted by passing aqueous solutions supersaturated with respect to celestite over freshly cleaved barite (001) surfaces. Solution supersaturation, bcelestite, was varied from 1 to 45.7 (βcelestite = a(Sr2+) . a(SO2-4)/Kspcel). At supersaturations below 10 neither two-dimensional nucleation neither step advancement are observed on barite (001) surfaces. However, once the two-dimensional nucleation barrier is overcome (bcelestite > 10), nuclei preferentially form on cleavage steps parallel to [100], [110] and [120] directions and more scarcely on terraces. The subsequent growth of two-dimensional nuclei leads to the development of celestite ‘‘islands’’. Their morphology is defined by (001) face and {210} and {100} forms and can be explained on the basis of PBCtheory. The coalescence of such islands results in the formation of a homogeneous SrSO4 layer. Growth rates along [001] direction have been measured for the whole supersaturation range. The growth rate equation for ‘Birth and Spread’’ crystal growth mechanism has been successfully fitted to our experimental data. The fitting process has provided basic growth parameters in a good agreement with theoretical ones. Both the high transitional supersaturation required for twodimensional nucleation and the high interfacial energy value obtained from the fitting of the ‘‘Birth and Spread’’ equation (σcel–bar 001 = 0:137 J/m2) indicate low affinity of SrSO4 growth units for barite (001) faces. This is consistent with the relative high mismatch between celestite and barite structure. The behaviour of the epitaxial growth described in this work can help to interpret the oscillatory zoning frequently occurring in both natural and synthetic crystals of the BaxSr1-xSO4 solid solution. |
|---|